Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah... I'm calling BS on this claim. EPC shows the same springs & sway bars from 1997-2002, worldwide.I wasn't aware of the changes to springs and roll bar initiated in the face lift cars.

I believe that is all correct. @WDB748372 may be able to confirm, I'm not an expert on the 210 variants.So, to get this correct:
Is this all correct?
- The W210 E55 AMG was produced ONLY with the natch-asp AMG M113 from 1999-2002, albeit with a horsepower upgrade from the .036 M119 ~315-320HP to the M113 ~349 and ~354. For the US market, ONLY sedans were produced, no W210 E55 wagons?
- The W211 E55 AMG (with supercharged M113) were produced from 2003 through 2006 model year, in both sedan and wagon for the US market.
- The W211 E63 AMG took over as of the 2007 model year (what I have), which correlated to the "facelift" of the W211 during its production run.
- The W212 E63 AMG took over in the US as of model year 2010, but carried over the M156 (almost same from W211) for the 2010 and 2011 model years, before the smaller displacement twint V-8 "E63" AMG took over.

Spot on. That's correct, no 210 E55 wagons for U.S. market. RoW got 1,721.So, to get this correct:
Is this all correct?
- The W210 E55 AMG was produced ONLY with the natch-asp AMG M113 from 1999-2002, albeit with a horsepower upgrade from the .036 M119 ~315-320HP to the M113 ~349 and ~354. For the US market, ONLY sedans were produced, no W210 E55 wagons?
- The W211 E55 AMG (with supercharged M113) were produced from 2003 through 2006 model year, in both sedan and wagon for the US market.
- The W211 E63 AMG took over as of the 2007 model year (what I have), which correlated to the "facelift" of the W211 during its production run.
- The W212 E63 AMG took over in the US as of model year 2010, but carried over the M156 (almost same from W211) for the 2010 and 2011 model years, before the smaller displacement twint V-8 "E63" AMG took over.
Yes, and even more shocking is how FEW they made! So much for a nice winter driver. E55 4Matic wagon would be a nice grocery getter.They made a 4-Matic?? Whoa...

oh no winter would kill it the metal or finish on those cars were junkYes, and even more shocking is how FEW they made! So much for a nice winter driver. E55 4Matic wagon would be a nice grocery getter.
![]()
@mottati - Is that reading accurate? wow!i wouldn't call myself a w210 freak, but i do like my e55. Underrated cars. Token odo pic from a few months ago.
Yes, and even more shocking is how FEW they made! So much for a nice winter driver. E55 4Matic wagon would be a nice grocery getter.
![]()


All Hyde, leave the good doctor at home. The previous owner of my 500E now drives one. But he's a special case... former race car driver and racing team owner. Now in his mid 70's, he has yet to see a need -- zero -- for Dr. Jekyll.I know a guy who recently just sold his 15 E63S wagon. That thing was a weapon. Not enough Jekyll and too much Hyde.
That's kind of a bummer to hear. I do like my w210.065 and it is quite Toyota-like in its reliability. I do like the sound and feel of the doors when you shut them, but I do find the interior fittings, although relatively robust, to be ever so slightly inferior in robustness to those of the w124.Compared to the W211, I found the W210 to be better made with nicer quality materials inside. They were also Toyota reliable. I'm not sure what they're worth these days but I remember discussing them on this forum a few years back and they were bargains compared to the E500E.
I found the opposite. The 210 interiors were seriously budget IMO. The 211 was, IMO, generally a step up... with the exception of the seat upholstery. I've seen way, way too many 211 front seats falling apart at odometer readings that don't align with the level of disintegration. The AMG models of 211 have far better seat leather, I've never seen an AMG 211 with shredded seats. At worst, the non-AMG 210+211 interiors are equal, and I think the 211 is slightly better (other than the seats). YMMV, etc etc.Compared to the W211, I found the W210 to be better made with nicer quality materials inside. They were also Toyota reliable. I'm not sure what they're worth these days but I remember discussing them on this forum a few years back and they were bargains compared to the E500E.

I don't need to hear things like this. I'd be all over a "too much Hyde" ride. Sadly, this isn't in the budget.I know a guy who recently just sold his 15 E63S wagon. That thing was a weapon. Not enough Jekyll and too much Hyde.

I will also say that I prefer the exterior design of the 211 over the 210 (I like the slanted headlights look of the 211 better than the upright oval headlight look of the 210). The 211 headlights overall are definitely more advanced than the 210's.As a six month 211 owner, I admit I may be strongly biased here. I have never owned a 210, nor will I ever own one.
There were several items on my W211 that failed prematurely (at 120kmi). The visor mirrors were broken, and needed replacement (they are separate from the visor itself). The dash vent wheels get pushed in (broken) and I had to replace left+right sides. The seats, dash, and door panels were all fine.I don't know about the W211. I bought my CDI with 103k miles and it looked like a car with double the miles. Sun visors were failing, overhead console was broken, seats were worn, door panels were worn, ash tray cover is not soft open. It just seemed poorer.
I also like the 211 appearance over the 210. My wife refers to the 210 as "Bugeyes", lol.I will also say that I prefer the exterior design of the 211 over the 210 (I like the slanted headlights look of the 211 better than the upright oval headlight look of the 210).
211 HID's are phenomenal. With SDS Developer Mode you can enable the Euro-only ILS (Intelligent Light System). I've never driven another vehicle with better headlights. The 210 HID's are good on low beam only (with new lenses). 210 HID's are mono-Xenon, the high beams are H7 halogens and are nearly useless. I was really surprised the 210 high beams were so poor.The 211 headlights overall are definitely more advanced than the 210's.
Same here. The square fender profile is just... ewwww. The 212 brought back a functional analog coolant temp gauge though... the 211 bar graphs are not linear and are no more useful than a domestic C/H temp indicator.I very definitely dislike the more squared-off 212's exterior design.

I didn't realize the W212 E550 got the M278 biturbo. That engine makes a lot of power... the performance is darn close to the W211 M156 E63, despite a 100hp deficit on paper, plus higher curb weight! I suspect MB under-rated these.Our current drivers are both 2012 W212 E550 4matics, both low miles [review here]. I love the squared off looks. To me they have just enough tech without having an IPOD glued to the dash. I know the engine stories and I probably over service them but when you want to get going quick they just plant and go. They are just as quick as my '03 E55 was plus the 4matic is great if you live I snow country.

That and the AMG variant are terrifying. I hear that there's an oil pressure system that can be disabled which helps save these engines but I don't know much about it. A guy I know in Dubai bought a G63 and had to put a replacement engine in it within 6 months. He promptly sold it afterwards and bought a G55K which he's been very happy with.I want to love the M278 but am really nervous about the downright terrible reputation.
@gerryvz - I assume that you bought an E63 if you're talking about dipsticks. If so, you probably also don't have to deal with SBC which I think will kill off many W211's once the class action warranty runs out.
On the advice of counsel, I invoke my fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination and respectfully decline to answer your question.@gerryvz - Congratulations. I missed this post. Now that you've owned it for 5 months I'm curious to know if you've had any regarding point #7?
I have a face for radio, the AMG emblem doesnt change that. Maybe window tint will.....respectfully decline to answer your question.
Yes it is, I really want to see the 750k badge, i'm around 416k miles currently. No major engine work. Long term owner was a service manager at mb san francisco who had a big commute, so lots of easy highway miles, and 5k mobile 1 oil changes.@mottati - Is that reading accurate? wow!
I don't believe it was, at least nearly to the extent that it was on the 210. Though I have seen A FEW situations where 124 perches failed, the overall rust issues on the 124 are miniscule as compared to the 210. This is particularly so in Europe.Weren't spring perch a problem on w124 as well?
W210 spring perch failures are not uncommon in salty areas (New England region of USA, for example).I don't believe [the spring perch] was [a problem], at least nearly to the extent that it was on the 210. Though I have seen A FEW situations where 124 perches failed, the overall rust issues on the 124 are miniscule as compared to the 210. This is particularly so in Europe.
That's my opinion and observation, as well. Though the 210 was a pretty big sea change from the 124 in terms of the electronics and electrical system, as well as the beginning of the "modularity" era of MBs, where pre-manufactured assemblies were installed onto the car, whereas with the W124 (and preceding generations) individual components were still replaceable throughout the car.There's a smaller leap from 124->210 compared to the 210->211.



Here's my vin: WDBJF74J1YB071754 somewhere around 416,500 miles currently. It's in my 'daily driver, winter beater' rotation. No rust (california car). My son has been driving it for the past couple weeks, it's also the car that gets loaned out to friends and family when someone is in town, or needs a car for a bit.A few days ago I was trying to find the VIN of one and as I'm looking through the potential VINs it made me realize how many of these cars are well past ~150k miles. I was thinking about going through all the US VINs and recording the last reported mileage to get a better sense and see how many presentable ones there may be left after 20+ years.
Unpopular opinion but the rust issue on these cars are a bit overblown. Every car has its own flaws and if ignored then it's more likely for these to be exposed. Don't think there has been much care for these cars so they've taken a beating. And the value often doesn't justify the proper way to address rust issues.
Ugh. Everything is a huge module now. And .... too many curves.That's my opinion and observation, as well. Though the 210 was a pretty big sea change from the 124 in terms of the electronics and electrical system, as well as the beginning of the "modularity" era of MBs, where pre-manufactured assemblies were installed onto the car, whereas with the W124 (and preceding generations) individual components were still replaceable throughout the car.
This necessitates with the 210, having to buy a more expensive complete assembly when a single part/component within it fails, whereas with the 124, it is possible to obtain and replace an individual item much of the time. This has only gotten worse since the 210, of course, and is not something that is specific to Mercedes-Benz cars. It is endemic to the entire automotive industry.
An example of this would be the W210 center console window switches -- for the W210, it's a complete module that has all four switches, plus the child lock switch, plus the mirror joystick, in one switch assembly with a green circuit board underpinning it. On the W124, you can and do replace each of the window switches, child lock switch, and mirror control joystick individually -- each of them plugs into a plastic frame in the console.
If one W210 switch fails, it's a $210 (MB list, ~$160 discounted) proposition for the whole damn module. If one W124 window switch fails, it's a $32.50 proposition ($25 discounted) for a single MB window switch. $10-15 each if you want to aftermarket.
With the 211, it's even worse. You have an oval switch assembly in the driver's door that includes all four window switches in a single module. And so on......
W124 window switch
View attachment 208775
W210 window switch
View attachment 208774
W211 window switch
View attachment 208773

The W210 was the first Mercedes model that used water based paint. I don't think that Mercedes Benz used the correct sealer at the time and they were very prone to rust. The revised model from 2000-2002 was better and I think the body was dipped. I had the spring perch issue back in 2004 in my 97 E420. The car had spent the first 5 years of its life in Chicago before I bought it in Texas. The problem came up shortly after I had moved to Atlanta. That was when I first met Jono who inspected it and suggested I call MB corporate and bitch them out. They fixed it under warranty (thanks @jhodg5ck ).I don't believe it was, at least nearly to the extent that it was on the 210. Though I have seen A FEW situations where 124 perches failed, the overall rust issues on the 124 are miniscule as compared to the 210. This is particularly so in Europe.
Thanks! I see the last recorded mileage is 411,391 miles.Here's my vin: WDBJF74J1YB071754 somewhere around 416,500 miles currently. It's in my 'daily driver, winter beater' rotation. No rust (california car). My son has been driving it for the past couple weeks, it's also the car that gets loaned out to friends and family when someone is in town, or needs a car for a bit.