Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh what the fear of breaking something will do to a man...Thats half your problem! LOL! Redline is your friend, not the enemy. Besides, the M103 doesnt make much power below 4k...
@gerryvz they are crystal clear! thank you again for the second set! (dont mind the scuffed and slightly cracked front bumper hehe)How are those Lamin-X pieces doing on there?
@gsxr Still on order in germany, hopefully i’ll see them this week, I have two more sessions of 7gal fill ups and hot runs to complete with liquimoly valve clean.WOW! Glad you solved the mystery. Is the detonation/knock problem solved with the new plugs / correct heat range?
I don’t think we will ever see that stuff in California.new gas just dropped? 94 octane?? cool View attachment 168729
Nice! I haven't seen 94 octane in years... it's only available in certain regions, and then usually only at a handful of gas stations.new gas just dropped? 94 octane?? cool
This is 1000% correct. Many years ago I experimented with high-octane race gas in the 500E for drag racing. TLDR: there was zero change in anything. Totally not worth it.Point being to me was that a stock engine is set up to run on a certain octane fuel and going above that octane will not increase horsepower or torque. The only significant horsepower and torque came from the E85.
Bottom line is to me is using the 94 octane fuel in the M119 is not going to help much if at all.
Ok sick... that makes things alot easier to understand with the ETM then lol... if only I can get 5 minutes without torrential downpour now..Those appear to be factory splices within the harness, which is not unusual... you'll find more if you slice open other harnesses.
Good thing you had a functional OE MB spare. I'm almost positive these door check straps were NLA from MB for a while, but appear to be available again.If we need a reminder THIS is why you should never cheap out and buy Febi lol. Made in china, had my concerns after I installed them last summer, and as I’m working on the drivers window regulator, the captive nut shears off. Thankfully had a replacement good used MB original spare.
I remember them being NLA at time of order, months later during install/doubt I checked and they were back but I just couldn’t justify $500 worth of check straps but - It’s clearly necessary seeing as the aftermarket disappoints once again :/Good thing you had a functional OE MB spare. I'm almost positive these door check straps were NLA from MB for a while, but appear to be available again.
These had been $15-$20 from discount dealers years ago, now $147 MSRP (!!) and over $100 from discount dealers!!! 5x-6x price increase.
1955-1993 Mercedes-Benz Door Check 126-720-05-16 | MB OEM Parts
1955-1993 Mercedes-Benz part # 126-720-05-16 - Door Checkwww.mboemparts.com
![]()
And there are so many people out there (including not just one or two on this forum) who continue to insist that reboxed Chinese made Febi parts are just fine.If we need a reminder THIS is why you should never cheap out and buy Febi lol. Made in china, had my concerns after I installed them last summer, and as I’m working on the drivers window regulator, the captive nut shears off. Thankfully had a replacement good used MB original spare.
View attachment 169678
I assume drilling a 3mm hole in my old t-stat is the “fully open mod”?Removing the t-stat doesn't help, as the Mercedes t-stat is not a simple flow control valve. As it opens it uncovers one port (allowing cool liquid from the radiator to enter), while simultaneously blocking another port to prevent hot liquid from recirculating. In general it's better to leave the thermostat in place. Or you can try to modify an old thermostat to the "forced fully open" position.
Then, lots of flushing... just don't put cool water into a hot or warm engine.
When all done you can probably let the G48 coolant go at least 5 years, if not 10-15 years, if your plastic expansion reservoir has the silica pack in it. Diesels and M119's have this, I forget if the M103 cars also do.
Nope.I assume drilling a 3mm hole in my old t-stat is the “fully open mod”?
@gsxr Found this image on your site in the tools section. I see what you mean now my fault lol.. now to figure out how to fab thisNope.
Study A, B, and C in the FSM:
Interesting info. I always thought that higher octane fuel in a low compression engine did not increase the power. We ran Sunoco 110/112 in my raceI was watching Motor Trend TV this AM waiting for the start of the 24Hours of Le Mans race to start.
Anyway, a 1/2 hour show called Engine Masters came on and spent the whole show talking about fuel octanes increasing horsepower & torque. It seemed appropriate to show the results here. So here goes.
They set up a 6.3 liter Chevy crate engine on a dyno. The engine was stated to have 530HP / 498# Torque stock. They ran 5 types of fuel thru it starting with CA 87, CA 91, Sunoco 110 racing fuel, Sunoco 116 racing fuel and lastly E85
Results below
87 octane unleaded 539.4HP / 498.8#TQ
91 octane unleaded 539.6HP / 501.1#TQ
110 octane leaded 539.9HP / 499.1#TQ
116 octane leaded. 541.3HP / 497.4#TQ
E85 ethanol ———-551.5HP / 506.5#TQ
The testers only messed with the timing and fuel air mixtures to accommodate for knocking especially for the 87 octane fuel.
What was amazing to me was that except for the E85 the was almost exactly the same. The E85 needed more timing advance by 6 or 7 degrees.
Point being to me was that a stock engine is set up to run on a certain octane fuel and going above that octane will not increase horsepower or torque. The only significant horsepower and torque came from the E85.
As far as the torque figures they remained similar to the stock engines except for the E85.
Bottom line is to me is using the 94 octane fuel in the M119 is not going to help much if at all.
EDIT: This info can be googled by typing in “Engine Masters Octane” it’s on U-Tube
Corrected HP/TQ figures
@gsxr@gsxr Found this image on your site in the tools section. I see what you mean now my fault lol.. now to figure out how to fab this
View attachment 171533
My quick action turning off the motor and coasting may have saved things, but we'll see after a compression and leakdown test later today. Checked this AM still no oil in coolant, coolant in oil, or any leakage around the HG from visual inspection. Car still sounds like a diesel on startup with a bad misfire, pulling plugs later.Oh noes. I'd start with a compression test (warm, if possible) and see what numbers you get.
![]()
Thanks mane! My concern is that I may have had an airlock that didn’t immediately present itself, then under high heat and pressure forced a hose to blow off? Not sure if that’s a possible cause as to why it blew off in the first place but neither here nor there at this point… working it out nowBeen there / done that with the overheatingI got super lucky in my case though. I had airlock and could have possibly seen bad temp readings. This is a good wake up call to check position 2 on ignition, make sure all the bulbs light up.
Compression test is a good idea- if you don't have the tools for that (or wanted additional information), you easily get a kit where you test for blown head gasket by looking for combustion gasses in the coolant (once it comes to temp or remove thermostat). Depending on how bad things are, you might be able to visually see bubbling in the expansion tank
Not sure what the best case scenario is here, but definitely crossing fingers for you!![]()
5 cranks each cylinder on a stone cold engine. Waiting on an air compressor from a friend for a leak down test -- Bad rings would show on a compression test, so would a bad HG? really troubled as to what else could've broken or caused a hard start issue smh130 low to 160 high on compression is about 19% difference, which is quite a bit. This translates into 9 bar / 11 bar, and the 2.0 bar difference exceeds the maximum allowed difference of 1.5 bar between highest and lowest. If lowest was a bit over 130 and highest was a bit under 160 you might just be at the limits of 1.5 bar difference. Was the compression test done with the engine hot, and did you crank it until the pressure stopped increasing?
I'm not sure about the hard start or loss of power. I'd lean towards the leakdown test next. Could also be the compression is abnormally low with a cold engine, which could cause the hard starting when cold?
![]()