Postby J. M. van Swaay on Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:07 pm
I tried to upload a jpeg format picture--I got an error message saying the file I was trying to upload was invalid. Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks again for all your work on this site.
J. M. van Swaay
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:29 pm
Shouldn't be a problem as others have been able to upload and attach photos no problem. I will check the extensions it accepts but I am sure that .JPEG is on the list. You may want to rename it .JPG and see if that helps though. But in the "Owners & Their Cars" board a number of folks have posted with no trouble.
Cheers,
Gerry
=================================
Postby Pupsi on Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:23 am
I think what we need is an automatic picture re-sizer so that the pictures arent huge unless you click to expand them.
Or is this only happening to me?
P u p s i
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:26 am
I downloaded tonight an automatic picture resizer, but it requires a UNIX command-line interface to install and configure and I didn't have the time tonight to hassle with that. Perhaps this weekend.
Rest assured, it will be implemented and it's fairly high on my list of ongoing tweaks.
Cheers,
Gerry
=================================
Postby Pupsi on Sat Dec 06, 2008 6:46 am
Thanks Gerry, you're doing a great job so far.
P u p s i
=================================
Postby J. M. van Swaay on Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:13 pm
I think there may be a maximum file size restriction. I was able to upload pictures taken with an older (lower resolution) camera. After cropping and compressing the picture that generated the "invalid file" message, I was able to upload it as well..................
Thanks Gerry,
J. M. van Swaay
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:46 pm
Yes there is a file size limit that is easily adjusted through a setting in the admin control panel. I think I set it to 2 MB per image, as there is NO REASON that an uploaded image needs to be any larger than that. If it is, it needs to be either compressed or its' size decreased. I will make exceptions if an image is extremely high-resolution, such as to be used for a desktop background or whatnot.
Cheers,
Gerry
=================================
Postby gsxr on Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:35 pm
Yes, 2MB is very generous. I'd be happy with 1MB (just to speed up picture downloads). Some forums (coughmercedesshopcough) have stupidly low limits for image sizes, i.e. 75kb or 600x800 pixel size. That's practically an avitar, not a photo. Nice work, Gerry!
:rock:
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1995 E420 (W.I.P.)
1994 E500 (Q-ship)
1993 300D (Sportline)
1987 300D (Sportline Stage 2)
1987 300D (R.I.P)
Click here for my website photos, documents, and movies.
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:05 pm
Well, Scott had to "up" the limits over time as well as the file types allowed. I am currently not allowing movies (.avi, .wmv, .swf, .mov, .mp4, etc.) although I am open to that if/when there is a need.
The main problem is storage space and bandwidth usage costs, which are the main issues with a hoster. If/when the traffic gets to the point where significant bandwidth and storage space is being used, I will either have to pony up more cash to the hoster I'm currently using or host the site myself (which is what Scott had done at his apartment). I'd rather pony up the cash for a hoster due to better reliability and infrastructure. If this cost increase is significant, I'd have to pass part of it on to the users here, but today we are a LONG WAY away from needing to do that.
I will provide some regular data and links as to site usage statistics over time as the site builds. In just a week's worth of use, we've got more than 80 users already which is pretty cool. Mostly the 500ecstasy.com regulars, but I expect this to reach in the hundreds fairly soon as the site gets spidered more, and the main site fills out.
Cheers,
Gerry
I tried to upload a jpeg format picture--I got an error message saying the file I was trying to upload was invalid. Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks again for all your work on this site.
J. M. van Swaay
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:29 pm
Shouldn't be a problem as others have been able to upload and attach photos no problem. I will check the extensions it accepts but I am sure that .JPEG is on the list. You may want to rename it .JPG and see if that helps though. But in the "Owners & Their Cars" board a number of folks have posted with no trouble.
Cheers,
Gerry
=================================
Postby Pupsi on Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:23 am
I think what we need is an automatic picture re-sizer so that the pictures arent huge unless you click to expand them.
Or is this only happening to me?
P u p s i
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:26 am
I downloaded tonight an automatic picture resizer, but it requires a UNIX command-line interface to install and configure and I didn't have the time tonight to hassle with that. Perhaps this weekend.
Rest assured, it will be implemented and it's fairly high on my list of ongoing tweaks.
Cheers,
Gerry
=================================
Postby Pupsi on Sat Dec 06, 2008 6:46 am
Thanks Gerry, you're doing a great job so far.
P u p s i
=================================
Postby J. M. van Swaay on Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:13 pm
I think there may be a maximum file size restriction. I was able to upload pictures taken with an older (lower resolution) camera. After cropping and compressing the picture that generated the "invalid file" message, I was able to upload it as well..................
Thanks Gerry,
J. M. van Swaay
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:46 pm
Yes there is a file size limit that is easily adjusted through a setting in the admin control panel. I think I set it to 2 MB per image, as there is NO REASON that an uploaded image needs to be any larger than that. If it is, it needs to be either compressed or its' size decreased. I will make exceptions if an image is extremely high-resolution, such as to be used for a desktop background or whatnot.
Cheers,
Gerry
=================================
Postby gsxr on Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:35 pm
Yes, 2MB is very generous. I'd be happy with 1MB (just to speed up picture downloads). Some forums (coughmercedesshopcough) have stupidly low limits for image sizes, i.e. 75kb or 600x800 pixel size. That's practically an avitar, not a photo. Nice work, Gerry!
:rock:
Dave M.
Boise, ID
1995 E420 (W.I.P.)
1994 E500 (Q-ship)
1993 300D (Sportline)
1987 300D (Sportline Stage 2)
1987 300D (R.I.P)
Click here for my website photos, documents, and movies.
=================================
Postby gerryvz on Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:05 pm
Well, Scott had to "up" the limits over time as well as the file types allowed. I am currently not allowing movies (.avi, .wmv, .swf, .mov, .mp4, etc.) although I am open to that if/when there is a need.
The main problem is storage space and bandwidth usage costs, which are the main issues with a hoster. If/when the traffic gets to the point where significant bandwidth and storage space is being used, I will either have to pony up more cash to the hoster I'm currently using or host the site myself (which is what Scott had done at his apartment). I'd rather pony up the cash for a hoster due to better reliability and infrastructure. If this cost increase is significant, I'd have to pass part of it on to the users here, but today we are a LONG WAY away from needing to do that.
I will provide some regular data and links as to site usage statistics over time as the site builds. In just a week's worth of use, we've got more than 80 users already which is pretty cool. Mostly the 500ecstasy.com regulars, but I expect this to reach in the hundreds fairly soon as the site gets spidered more, and the main site fills out.
Cheers,
Gerry

