• Hi Guest !

    Welcome to the 500Eboard forum.

    Since its founding in late 2008, 500Eboard has become the leading resource on the Internet for all things related to the Mercedes-Benz 500E and E500. In recent years, we have also expanded to include the 400E and E420 models, which are directly related to the 500E/E500.

    We invite you to browse and take advantage of the information and resources here on the site. If you find helpful information, please register for full membership, and you'll find even more resources available. Feel free to ask questions, and make liberal use of the "Search" function to find answers.

    We hope you will become an active contributor to the community!

    Sincerely,
    500Eboard Management

Mercedes Drops The “L-Word”

gsxr

.036 Hoonigan™, E500E Boffin, @DITOG
Staff member
Interesting article. Not much detail but this might just mean focusing more on SUV's & their core lineup, with less investment into Maybach and AMG.


Mercedes Drops The “L-Word” And Is Ready To Flood The Streets With Cars​

The company is shifting strategy and planning 36 new models to weather a brutal market shakeup

  • Mercedes is reportedly ditching luxury branding to pursue higher-volume, affordable models.
  • The company aims to produce more than 2 million vehicles annually to restore profitability.
  • Executives blame excessive Maybach and AMG spending for the current financial downturn.
For decades, Mercedes-Benz has stood as a symbol of automotive prestige, crafting some of the most admired vehicles on the road. But the market is evolving, and Mercedes is not immune to the pressure.

Like many long-established automakers grappling with economic headwinds and shifting consumer expectations, the brand is now entering a period of uncertainty, one that may involve stepping back from the luxury identity it once leaned on so heavily.

According to unnamed insiders, Mercedes-Benz is beginning to move away from its long-held luxury positioning. The word “luxury” is reportedly being phased out of the company’s official strategy, with its target image shifting toward a broader, more inclusive appeal.

The “L-Word”

Some within the company have even started referring to luxury as the “L-word,” according to Handelsblatt, a telling reflection of how dramatically the internal narrative may be changing.

Speaking to the German publication, Mercedes CEO Ola Källenius emphasized that “our goal was and remains to offer customers the most desirable products in all our segments.” While Källenius has long favored profitability over production volume, slower factory output appears to be changing the calculus.

Sources inside the company say there’s now a push to bring pricing and sales back into alignment. This may include increasing production volumes, especially as employee representatives like works council chairman Ergun Lümali argue that producing fewer than two million vehicles per year is simply not viable.

The report goes on to state that the company has spent too much money and time on high-end Maybach and AMG models with a price tag of well over €100,000 ($116,000). While these vehicles may showcase engineering and design prowess, they haven’t been enough to keep margins healthy across the board.

Profits Crumble

Profits at Mercedes slumped by more than half through the first half of this year, and its automotive arm now has a margin of just 5.3 percent, far below previous highs of closer to 15 percent. According to Kallenius, “our industry is experiencing heavy rain, hail, storms, and snow at the same time.”

To battle the tough times, Mercedes is planning a massive product offensive and moving forward, “intends to be more modest and communicate more realistic goals.” This includes its pursuit of selling affordable compact cars and SUVs to the masses.


Earlier this year, Mercedes announced that it was reducing its commitment to EVs, and in addition to launching 17 new EVs by 2027, it also plans to release 19 new or heavily revised combustion-powered vehicles over the coming years. In its pursuit of profits, it seems Mercedes has decided volume is more important than ever.
 
Wow, ask Nissan how that's working for them. Toyota and Honda (including their luxury marques) are crushing MB globally. Wish MB just stayed in their lane making quality, upper end cars for the qualified buyer - That is (was) the niche. What's next, BMW going back to make airplanes for the Luftwaffe?
 
Fire Gorden Wagener, re-introduce a high quality interior and return to a design language that is less gaudy and frilly and sales will increase.

I wanted to get an A45 S instead of an Audi RS3, but I couldn’t get over the cheap interior with its tacked on screens and low rent materials.
 
I would argue they dropped the L word over 20 years ago.

People in the market today for a new car are almost exclusively leasing and really only care about the monthly payment they then decide which car to pursue - in this type of market there is little brand loyalty imo.
 
Driving a mercedes used to really mean something and now everyone drives a plastic c class and thinks it's an amg b/c of the trim
I agree, the use of the term "AMG line" is another nail in the coffin.

I don't know who started it first with the others such as the Audi S Line and the 3 coloured go faster M series stripes on a BMW grill.
 
Last edited:
Again, this is what happens when Finance and Marketing started calling the shots as opposed to Engineering. I remember vividly the old Benz slogan:"Engineered like no other car in the world". Seems like a distant universe today unfortunately.
 
Fire Gorden Wagener, re-introduce a high quality interior and return to a design language that is less gaudy and frilly and sales will increase.

I wanted to get an A45 S instead of an Audi RS3, but I couldn’t get over the cheap interior with its tacked on screens and low rent materials.
Couldn’t agree more, the rental Mercedes I’ve had recently are way too much bling with screens, LED’s and bings and bongs everywhere. It looks like a Russian small time criminals dream car from Wish. The quality of lots of materials are just not good enough. Scratchy plastic on surfaces you interact with.

Where’s the purpose and thought behind it all? Did anybody stop and ask for this? Is this what the customer wants? I’m not so sure.

OTOH I don’t own a car company selling millions of vehicles every year so there’s that. 😊
 
Public companies are valued on year over year growth. The only way to do that is to expand offerings and cut costs. If it was me, I'd buy a company instead of diluting the brand.

Mitsubishi must be ripe for a takeover and there's already an AMG connection.
 

Attachments

  • mitsubishi-galant-amg-1.jpg
    mitsubishi-galant-amg-1.jpg
    47.1 KB · Views: 7
Public companies are valued on year over year growth. The only way to do that is to expand offerings and cut costs.
This annoys me greatly. It implies that a highly profitable company sucks if it is not growing. Hey, if it's raking in a massive profit year after year after year... does it matter if it's growing? NOPE. The company I work for suffers from the same sickness. Endless growth is demanded, and damn the facts & realities. Eternal growth is not sustainable. Not sure what the fix is other than to take the company private.

:oldman:
 
Eternal growth is not sustainable. Not sure what the fix is other than to take the company private.

This is the fix exactly. I’ve always favored private over public companies for this and other reasons. I don’t care about the concerns of passive investors. Why make it harder on the active participants for the sake of the passive ones??

As for MB, customers get the cars they deserve the same way people get the governments they deserve. If you treat cars like throwaway objects it’s only a matter of time before every car available is a throw away object. That time has arrived.

And yeah, throwaway doesn’t work with heavy investment items like EVs. They haven’t invested in AMG since they bought the rest of the company from Messrs. Melcher and Aufrecht, except on the track.

maw

EDIT… luxury and throwaway don’t exactly work together either
 
This annoys me greatly. It implies that a highly profitable company sucks if it is not growing. Hey, if it's raking in a massive profit year after year after year... does it matter if it's growing? NOPE. The company I work for suffers from the same sickness. Endless growth is demanded, and damn the facts & realities. Eternal growth is not sustainable. Not sure what the fix is other than to take the company private.

:oldman:
Ugh. I think from a public co perspective there are at least two angles:

- Shareholders. Does your public company take any shareholder willy nilly? Or does your public company spend a lot of effort using annual letters / meeting as a way to educate shareholders? By educate I mean fostering the right mentality and approach to looking at the business (Buffet) not wow the shareholders with the next whiz bang release (Musk).

- Earnings. Do you maximally distribute those earnings as dividends? Thats a way of saying “we dont have any better ideas for the cash so we return it to the shareholders.” Or do you think you have a great idea on what to do with the cash? (most companies)….

If you have an idea on what to do with those earnings, then do you invest in yourself or do you invest in others? Many companies invest in others as shareholders! Some companies can’t find any better company to invest in as a shareholder so they invest in themselves as a shareholder (buyback). And then you could invest in your own company not as a passive investor but in actively growing the biz …. Which is next….

- Then it is build vs buy. Do you take those earnings and invest in new products or whatever? (Sounds like what MB is doing). Or do you just buy someone with an existing line of business in area you want to expand into? (@alabbasi suggested Mitsubishi).

Automaking is a capital intensive business. I liked it better when, as @daantjie mentioned, MB’s rasion d’etre was being “engineered like no other in the world.”
 
As said, MB being a public company, they are beholden to Wall Street / DAX / investors and the mantra is always going to be a focus on profit margins, EBITDA and revenue growth. Pretty much every public company is.

Who gets the short end of the stick? Employees, who often get stiffed with "average" salaries with tiny or no annual raises, tiny or no annual bonuses, and stingy (if any) stock ownership plans; and customers, who over time get lower and lower quality products, because manufacturing is outsourced and quality control standards are laxened over time.

I've been saying this for 25 years now: it's been apparent since at least the Schrempp days (1990s) that MB has been on a slow downward slide. The company was able to survive for many years as a perceived "premium" and "high quality car maker" by coasting on its hard-earned reputation for building just that from the 1950s through the early 1990s.

Schrempp also was responsible for introducing more model lines (A Class, B Class, SLK, CLS, CLK, GLx SUVs, and many more), and then over the past 10-12 years (well after Schrempp has been long gone as CEO) we've seen "AMG" or "AMG trim" models proliferate across every single product line, cheapening and hollowing out AMG too. There was a day when AMG (or BMW M) actually meant something, but those days are long, long gone.

I think in recent years the reputation and goodwill earned, has for the most part run out, and MB has become (and is now mostly seen as) a run of the mill car maker, just like all of the others. And many if not most people already know that any Japanese luxury brand (Acura, Lexus, Infiniti, perhaps Genesis (Korean)) is going to have better reliability and similar cachet as any MB or BMW.

It's funny, on the Lexus IS500 forum that I follow, there's plenty of banter among the 20 and 30-something snapperheads who love these V-8 Lexi, about trading TO or more commonly trading FROM a BMW (M2, M3, etc.) to Lexus, because of reliability and ease of ownership. You almost NEVER NEVER see anyone talking about Mercedes or AMG. Occasionally, Audi.

MB was most successful when it focused its corporate efforts on the key model lines -- S Class, E Class, C Class, SL-class, and G-class. Parts, systems and engineering was shared across all of these platforms, and it was relatively easy to maintain parity, spare parts, and support between all of them. But as soon as the model lines and trim lines began proliferating, now you have an exponential increase in parts SKUs, engineering levels and chassis to support. Unless you are a company with massive global scale like Toyota, GM or Ford, or perhaps Volkswagen, it's almost impossible to do this successfully.

I have also said for at least 20 years that anyone who buys or leases a new MB from 1995 onward is crazy. I have broken this only once, last year with the purchase of a very slightly used 2007 E63 AMG, but I consider this a long-term collectable car that is not the same as "regular" MB models. 2007 is also a really bad time for MB quality. They didn't really begin pulling out of their quality slump until about 2010 and later. Fortunately the AMG uses different materials than other E-class MBs of the time, and of course the powertrain is very different.

All of this collectively is why my wife and I purchased new Lexus models in 2023 (IS500, ~$70K) and 2024 (LX600, ~$120K). There is no way I would purchase (or even consider) a new MB at this point in time, and probably for the rest of my life. It's sad to see this once-proud and revered brand erode to become a shadow of its former self.

Of course, don't get me started on BMW. Their problems are different from MB's, though. They have had a lingering industrial design and image problem......
 
Not sure the model from Lexus, but I happened upon a new model that resembled the top of the line 2 door mb coupe. This had massive wheels and really looked sharp at the stop light. Not sure about rear seat space but this appeared to be a larger coupe. I thought it was a new MB but it was just a head turner. Plan to have a look.

Gerry is right, ability to get a car serviced for under $800 bucks at an authorized shop is a great selling point
 
Then it is build vs buy. Do you take those earnings and invest in new products or whatever? (Sounds like what MB is doing). Or do you just buy someone with an existing line of business in area you want to expand into? (@alabbasi suggested Mitsubishi).
Another option would be to manufacture Chinese electric cars in European factories, while producing German combustion engine cars in Chinese plants. This way, both sides could expand their offerings without incurring heavy R&D costs and while skirting tariffs. None of this is new. Honda and Triumph (later followed by Rover) had a similar partnership in the 1980s, as did Mitsubishi and Chrysler.

That said, I don’t believe Mercedes-Benz can successfully produce a truly low-cost car. It’s not in their DNA, and they’d likely hemorrhage money until they figured it out... if they ever did. If their philosophy remains that they must reinvent the wheel before they can use it, they risk going the way of Nokia or Blackberry.
 
Mercedes is sinking their own ship and trying to hold as much as they could.
The reason for sinking is this:

1.Weird celebrities featuring ugly models
2. 95 % of their design attempt of the cars are horrendous
3. CEO and the head designer must be smoking something.
4. Mercedes is suffering from identity crisis ( Go woke go broke? )
5. ...???
6. Profit

And using the BMW as an engine?
That brand that made Black series V12 engines. Come on!

It seems that we have had higher expectations by Mercedes because of the engineers were ahead of their time in 70s, 80s and 90s. Then the horsepower wars with W211 AMG until W213 models with great interior, performance and the design. But after that they somehow don't know what to do.
 

Who has watched this thread (Total: 3) View details

Back
Top