• Hi Guest !

    Welcome to the 500Eboard forum.

    Since its founding in late 2008, 500Eboard has become the leading resource on the Internet for all things related to the Mercedes-Benz 500E and E500. In recent years, we have also expanded to include the 400E and E420 models, which are directly related to the 500E/E500.

    We invite you to browse and take advantage of the information and resources here on the site. If you find helpful information, please register for full membership, and you'll find even more resources available. Feel free to ask questions, and make liberal use of the "Search" function to find answers.

    We hope you will become an active contributor to the community!

    Sincerely,
    500Eboard Management

My Budget C124 Project

BRN9121

E500E Enthusiast
Member
Hello folks,

I am looking at buying a 1995 E220 Coupe that needs work. The C124 chassis was something I have always wanted to acquire and convert to AMG style.
Having said that, I will be on a budget and so I will be looking at aftermarket parts only, genuine parts are out of the question.

On that note, there is a vendor out in the far east that sells aftermarket AMG look wheels. Having considered many options and doing my due diligence on what is suitable for the car, I have concluded that to stick to as close to factory recommended spec wheels as possible. This vendor has these wheels in 17x8J ET25 only (squared setup). I am hesitant to go with ET25, I wanted ET30 to be safe and play with spacers later on.

What are your thoughts? Would ET25 work? The car is a regular fendered car. Also, would you consider a staggered 8" and 9.5" setup on that offset?

I will need all the advice and experience sharing I can get from everyone here. Would really appreciate it.
Thanks all in advance. I attach picture of the car, and the ebay link to the wheel in question.

New 17x8 Aero Classic Mercedes AMG Design Silver 5x112 (4 wheels) | eBay
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20251019-WA0000.jpg
    IMG-20251019-WA0000.jpg
    143.6 KB · Views: 10
8.0 ET25 is pretty aggressive on a standard 124, but can be made to work with fender spacers, rolled fender lips, etc per the AMG wheel install documents.

DO NOT try to fit a 9.0 or 9.5 rear wheel. It will poke outside the fender.

:seesaw:
 
ET25 is waay to much on a standard W124. ~ET35 is about as high as possible.

I have seen a set of period correct 17 inch Lorinsers if you need a set, might still be there. Needs restoration of course.
 
8.0 ET25 is pretty aggressive on a standard 124, but can be made to work with fender spacers, rolled fender lips, etc per the AMG wheel install documents.

DO NOT try to fit a 9.0 or 9.5 rear wheel. It will poke outside the fender.

:seesaw:
Thank you for that. Yes, the Mercedes document states that the recommended sizes are 17x8 ET30 or ET28.
The question is, how much fender work would be required for these to fit with no issues?

Can I safely follow the attached document below?

Pages from wheel_install_17x8.0_ET30.jpg

ET25 is waay to much on a standard W124. ~ET35 is about as high as possible.

I have seen a set of period correct 17 inch Lorinsers if you need a set, might still be there. Needs restoration of course.
Thank you Doc, but I am adamant on the AMG OZ type design.

7HxWo.jpg
 
For 8.0 ET25, I would use the document below (8.5 ET30). The wider 8.5 wheel has the outer lip approximately 6mm further outward compared to 8.0 ET30. Your selected wheel will be 10mm further out vs 8.0 ET30. Note that the fender lips need to be folded flat and pushed outward substantially, along with fender spacers, and a strut travel limiter.


I agree with 195910, this is definitely pushing the limits on a standard-body 124, and I normally wouldn't recommend it. However if the car is not significantly lowered (i.e., not below normal Sportline ride height) and not driven aggressively (think autocross or road course), you may not get any rubbing. Maybe. Possibly.

NOTE: With clearance this tight, the tire sidewall shape will be critical. Some tires with a 'square' profile may rub, while the same size tire with 'rounded' sidewall profile may not rub. Normally you would use a 235/45/17 tire on an 8.0 wheel, but again due to the super tight clearance, I'd consider a 225/45/17 tire.

:3gears:
 
Also, in the photo below, IMO that car is too low. There is zero air gap above the tire. This is just asking for problems with the tire rubbing while cornering, or when hitting bumps. On a standard 124, I prefer about 14.0" from fender lip to wheel center. The picture above looks like about 13" which is basically sitting on the suspension bump stops. The ride will also suck.

:wormhole:

1761145804611.png 1761145858439.png
 
Awesome info, really appreciate it.
For this purpose alone, I was considering adjustable coilovers.
 
Awesome info, really appreciate it.
For this purpose alone, I was considering adjustable coilovers.
Search the forum for prior discussion on coilovers. Up front, coilovers put substantial stress to the strut tower, which was never designed to support the full weight of the car. In the rear, it's always a hybrid that's basically just an adjustable coil spring with standard shock. Other than ability to fine-tune ride height to the millimeter at each corner, I have a hard time seeing the value in coilovers...

:grouphug:
 
Great, thanks.
I was doing some calculations, current setup ( above photo of the car in my initial post) on the car is 7.5x17 Monoblock 2's with ET35.
It's currently on 225/45's all around.

Calculation below on poke
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-10-22 185857.png
    Screenshot 2025-10-22 185857.png
    299.5 KB · Views: 7

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 5) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 1) View details

Back
Top