• Hi Guest !

    Welcome to the 500Eboard forum.

    Since its founding in late 2008, 500Eboard has become the leading resource on the Internet for all things related to the Mercedes-Benz 500E and E500. In recent years, we have also expanded to include the 400E and E420 models, which are directly related to the 500E/E500.

    We invite you to browse and take advantage of the information and resources here on the site. If you find helpful information, please register for full membership, and you'll find even more resources available. Feel free to ask questions, and make liberal use of the "Search" function to find answers.

    We hope you will become an active contributor to the community!

    Sincerely,
    500Eboard Management

w124 single diaphram vs dual diaphram brake booster

yao500e

Passionate owner of: 1994 E500, 1995 C36, 1997 E50
Member
Question fellow benz friends,

Single vs Dual brake booster.

Does dual booster just make the brake pedal far "more sensitive" or does it increase braking power, and shorter braking distances?

My guess is the former.

Any feedback would be appreciated. thank you.
 

Attachments

  • benz brake booster dual diaphram.png
    benz brake booster dual diaphram.png
    241.4 KB · Views: 2
There are different boosters for 1990's vintage MB's, both single and dual chamber. The dual-chamber provide additional pedal assist ("boost") vs single. There are various levels of boost. See chart at PDF page #6 at this link, the "boost factor" shows the relative difference.

Boost factor only affects pedal effort, which is NOT the same as braking power. Too much assist means the pedal is very sensitive / touchy, which is annoying. Too little assist and the pedal requires a lot of force / leg muscle to get the stopping power you want. To get more braking power (reduced stopping distances) you need larger brake rotors/calipers, and/or different pad compound, and/or stickier tires.

Click the link below for my journey down the booster swap road from almost 15 years ago. Read the whole thread, it starts out all sunshine and lollipops, but storm clouds appear in post #2:

TLDR: Pedal feel is highly subjective, and what one person thinks is great, another may not like at all. Pad compound can seriously affect pedal feel as well. Bigger is not always better, as I learned the hard way; I had to "downgrade" to a different setup after my big MC+booster turned out to be un-modulateable (hmmm, is that even a word?) during trail braking.


:3gears:
 
There are different boosters for 1990's vintage MB's, both single and dual chamber. The dual-chamber provide additional pedal assist ("boost") vs single. There are various levels of boost. See chart at PDF page #6 at this link, the "boost factor" shows the relative difference.

Boost factor only affects pedal effort, which is NOT the same as braking power. Too much assist means the pedal is very sensitive / touchy, which is annoying. Too little assist and the pedal requires a lot of force / leg muscle to get the stopping power you want. To get more braking power (reduced stopping distances) you need larger brake rotors/calipers, and/or different pad compound, and/or stickier tires.

Click the link below for my journey down the booster swap road from almost 15 years ago. Read the whole thread, it starts out all sunshine and lollipops, but storm clouds appear in post #2:

TLDR: Pedal feel is highly subjective, and what one person thinks is great, another may not like at all. Pad compound can seriously affect pedal feel as well. Bigger is not always better, as I learned the hard way; I had to "downgrade" to a different setup after my big MC+booster turned out to be un-modulateable (hmmm, is that even a word?) during trail braking.


:3gears:
Thanks @gsxr
really appreciate the information. That is exactly what i have concluded. However there are write ups that state dual diaphram boosters provide more brake fluid pressure to disc brakes. especially big brake upgrades.

An article such as this:

 
Thanks @gsxr
really appreciate the information. That is exactly what i have concluded. However there are write ups that state dual diaphram boosters provide more brake fluid pressure to disc brakes. especially big brake upgrades.
More pressure isn't always a good thing. As noted in my previous post, too much pressure (for a given amount of pedal effort) results in a super-touchy pedal that is basically unusable for normal driving. You only want/need a larger booster, with more assist, if you find it requires too much pedal pressure for the desired braking power. If it feels like there's no power assist, yeah, you may need a bigger booster.



An article such as this:
Copy/paste from that article:

"Single diaphragm brake boosters are commonly used for four-wheel drum or front disc/rear drum brake system configurations. Since drum brakes require a lower fluid pressure to actuate, the single diaphragm provides enough assistance. When upgrading to four-wheel disc brakes a dual diaphragm brake booster is recommended due to the higher fluid pressures required to move the multiple disc brake caliper pistons found at all four corners of the vehicle."
All modern MB's have 4-wheel discs and few of those have a single-diaphragm booster.

:duck:
 
There are different boosters for 1990's vintage MB's, both single and dual chamber. The dual-chamber provide additional pedal assist ("boost") vs single. There are various levels of boost. See chart at PDF page #6 at this link, the "boost factor" shows the relative difference.

Boost factor only affects pedal effort, which is NOT the same as braking power. Too much assist means the pedal is very sensitive / touchy, which is annoying. Too little assist and the pedal requires a lot of force / leg muscle to get the stopping power you want. To get more braking power (reduced stopping distances) you need larger brake rotors/calipers, and/or different pad compound, and/or stickier tires.

Click the link below for my journey down the booster swap road from almost 15 years ago. Read the whole thread, it starts out all sunshine and lollipops, but storm clouds appear in post #2:

TLDR: Pedal feel is highly subjective, and what one person thinks is great, another may not like at all. Pad compound can seriously affect pedal feel as well. Bigger is not always better, as I learned the hard way; I had to "downgrade" to a different setup after my big MC+booster turned out to be un-modulateable (hmmm, is that even a word?) during trail braking.


:3gears:
read the post and write up on mbworld. very informative. thank you. @gsxr
 
Update, i installed an SL500 dual diaphram and bigger Brembo F40 front brakes on my '95 C36. 13.1 inch (vs 12.6 inch stock)

Car is more sensitive to braking which is GOOD and it seems to stop a little better in stop in go traffic.
 
watching with popcorn, but curious if there is an E500E definitive fix for the noisey result from stepping on the brake pedal? (audible annoyance only not a braking problem)
 
brake booster model: Lucas A0044302730.
Got it. You upgraded 2 steps, from the single-diaphragm 10" with 3.85 boost factor used on most 6-cyl 124 and most W202, to the dual-diaphragm 8/9" with 5.60 boost, used on the 400E/500E and most R129's to 1997. Should be a pretty big difference.

Did you retain the original master cylinder?
 
Got it. You upgraded 2 steps, from the single-diaphragm 10" with 3.85 boost factor used on most 6-cyl 124 and most W202, to the dual-diaphragm 8/9" with 5.60 boost, used on the 400E/500E and most R129's to 1997. Should be a pretty big difference.

Did you retain the original master cylinder?
Yes. i retained the stock C36 master cylinder. not sure what the difference of master cylinders. physically, they looked very similar so my mechanic just decided to keep the stock one.
 

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 1) View details

Back
Top