I think I disagree with all of this. I didn’t like the CLS until the 2012 restyle, blunting the nose. Since then, I think it fits dead on between the EClass and the SClass. Almost a smaller, more performance oriented SClass in my view, as the SClass is affirmatively a whale since the W220 chassis. Problem is, the interior has been all EClass. I’ve seen some outfitted with a 4seater package (like our 500E), alcantara headliner (I think, don’t quote me), pano roof, but even then, that TV looking nav system haphazardly stuck onto the dash ruined it for me.
Finally, it looks like they have the integrated dash a la W222 SClass, and depending upon the option packages, a winner in my books — again for someone who wants to stand apart from (and perhaps above) the EClass but doesn’t want to drive a whale (let alone maintain one), and isn’t quite ready to ball out for the GT-4door (garish AMG on full display). Alas, the build tool on mbusa is still fitted for 2018 models, so I can’t tell what’s on offer. But a CLS AMG with lavish wood and leather interior, all wheel drive, integrated dash, rear seat appointments (4seater, heated, cool, recline) and sans carbon fiber boy racer package, might actually tick my boxes.
In short, you only want it to go like an AMG, not look like one. That’s been the case since the beginning — you wanted AMG to fit your drive train and suspension, and leave the rest of their garishness to themselves.
maw
P.S. Another review, mentioning the 500E even...
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2019-mercedes-benz-cls-class-first-drive-review; and another one, which captures my sentiments...the marketing department is just confused...
https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/2019-Mercedes-Benz-CLS-Class-Overview-c27606