Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Back in 2003, I bought a 1997 E420 which I later sold to a buddy of mine as I wanted to drive a classic. I drove a 560SEL for a while but it nickled and dimed me to death and then a W115 300D came along. I love the W114/W115 model and its driving dynamics but the 300D was so slow, i had my foot buried in it all the time. I eventually bought my E420 back after my buddy bought an E55. It was such a relief. The E420 was a fast car by any measurement and got about 20 MPG around town and 24 MPG on the highway which was pretty much all my 300D got because my foot was in it all the time.
More importantly, I want car that could get me out of a situation should the need arise. With a 240D, I don't think that it can get you out of a situation even if the other party is on foot. Think it through.
Would it be crazy to get rid of a 400E and get a w123 240d as a replacement?
Crazy? Certifiable. Check yourself into the local asylum, ASAP.Would it be crazy to get rid of a 400E and get a w123 240d as a replacement?
The main differences are absolutely everything. The only item recognizable is the gunsight star on the grille.What would be the main differences besides the chassis?
They're not that easy to work on, and not that simple either. Try changing a front brake rotor on a 123. Or fixing a snapped sway bar end. Don't forget regular valve adjustments, 43-piece engine mounts/shocks, and the total lack of modern safety equipment (ABS, airbags, traction control, and the ability to turn while in motion).so many people love the 240d and 300d. Many own a few and put up with them even though they are dangerously slow. I’m assuming it’s because they’re easy to work on and simple. Also cheap to repair. I’ve never owned anything diesel but it seems they need more attention on a regular basis than gas engines. They also offer no real fuel economy benefits as you said.
There is NOTHING magical about the 123 chassis. Nothing at all. Unless you are a masochist. Don't forget that most of the cult members are already in that asylum...There has to be something magical about those cars. They have a cult following even though they are infamous for being underpowered and lethargic
I see Jlaa knows what I'm on about: ^^^These days, there are other ways to self-flagellate that don't involve searing-hot-excruciating pain. I understand that whipping oneself's backside with a steel whip made of rusty barbed wire is actually considerably less painful than the flagellation method you propose.
"Not fun" is an understatement. Read Jlaa's post again.More importantly, will you enjoy driving an older car with minimal creature comforts? I don't recall where I read it, might have been here or it was on another MB forum, but someone recently summed up owning an older car like this:
"It's just not fun or enjoyable to drive something this old any more."
...and scrape bugs off the rear bumper too. And the occasional skateboarder or cyclist.That, and if you get a 240D, prepare to have to scrape the bugs from the rear window.
I took a ride in my venerable old '77 Mercedes 240D last night. 2.4 liters of raw power
We call it "Wanderdüne", because it is as slow as a wandering duneSomebody at Mercedes Benz obviously thought that the world needed an even smaller 200D for the German Autobahn market.... then offered a tow package as a factory option.
123 diesels are in demand !! Why don't you restore it and sell it?
"It's just not fun or enjoyable to drive something this old any more."
Or something to that effect. I can relate. The 1965 W111 I recently restored was an excellent example. I really wanted another Finnie, not having owned one in nearly 20 years. I love the car's looks and simplicity. However, after finding one, I discovered that driving it wasn't that enjoyable. I missed more comfortable seats, quieter cabin, improved suspension, telematics
Were the seats really that uncomfortable and what was the issue with suspension? I looked at the photos of a 1965 W111 - looks gorgeous. Thanks
I've got a friend in his 90s who wants to "gift" me his deceased wife's 240D. He knows I care for my cars and as a result has suggested gifting it to me upon his death, if not before, so he knows it will be well cared for. While I like this guy and he's a good friend, I'm not sure what I would do with a 240D, even if it's gratis. It's in good shape and operating condition, he rarely drives it and otherwise keeps it in his garage. I guess I'll take it when offered, but I'm not quite sure what I will do with it...
Dan
It wasn't that the seats or suspension weren't adequate, it was more like it's not comparable to modern day cars. More comfortable?
Dan
Was your idea to use Finnie as a DD? I can understand how that might become strenuous in modern traffic with modern cars.
No. But I think that I've become so accustomed to driving a more modern car I just didn't get the "joy" of driving an older car, that's all.
And my 1965 220SEb had no problem at all keeping up with modern traffic.
Dan
Same with my 240D. It’s not exactly quick off the line but it will cruise at 65-70 all day long. Having swapped in a manual transmission really makes it tolerable in modern traffic.
No. But I think that I've become so accustomed to driving a more modern car I just didn't get the "joy" of driving an older car, that's all.
And my 1965 220SEb had no problem at all keeping up with modern traffic.
Dan
You should hang out with @gsxr. 240D love should be infectuous....Having owned a multitude of 123's (diesel and gas) I think the 240D stick is the pick of the litter. It's fast enough off the line for any modern situation and cruises effortlessly at or just above the speed limit. I love the engine noise at idle. Many sites exist for repair advice and parts, and most projects and maintenance are pretty easy. Don't have one currently, but in the past whenever I've sold one I always wonder why shortly after and get back on the trail of another one.
Have you owned one? The items you mention aren't necessarily "better", just different. There are tradeoffs on both sides, but comparing well sorted examples of both, there's no question which you'd want to be in the driver seat for over the next 100kmi.I highly doubt a well sorted W123 is as uncomfortable and shitty as everyone in this thread is saying. Drivability aside, W123s were built better than the W124. Grease fittings on the door hinges, screws instead of clips for the door panels, more robust suspension, heavier duty window regulators, etc.
Interesting thread. I agree with what Gerry said these cars are all different, each having pluses and minuses. I personally love them all and really appreciate the evolution of the builds and styles. If I have to rank my preference I would put the 500e at the top for driving pleasure/enjoyment (subjective) followed by the 300D. Quirky as that sounds I love the sound of the diesel. This would put the w123 ahead of the W113, A124, R129 and R107, in that order. In the case of the 113 Pagoda its charm/style makes up for a lot of its shortcomings.
View attachment 104628
Have you driven a W140, like an S500 or S600?
Somebody at Mercedes Benz obviously thought that the world needed an even smaller 200D for the German Autobahn market.... then offered a tow package as a factory option.
I haven't read this entire thread, but maybe the image below is a nice paradox for your comments.We call it "Wanderdüne", because it is as slow as a wandering dune
And yes, you can tow 3300 lbs with it. At least in theory.
The real question: Where the heck did that badge go?!I haven't read this entire thread, but maybe the image below is a nice paradox for your comments.
View attachment 105764
(it came to Norway in 2012, had some contact with the owner but didn't get the VIN, no later records on it)