• Hi Guest !

    Welcome to the 500Eboard forum.

    Since its founding in late 2008, 500Eboard has become the leading resource on the Internet for all things related to the Mercedes-Benz 500E and E500. In recent years, we have also expanded to include the 400E and E420 models, which are directly related to the 500E/E500.

    We invite you to browse and take advantage of the information and resources here on the site. If you find helpful information, please register for full membership, and you'll find even more resources available. Feel free to ask questions, and make liberal use of the "Search" function to find answers.

    We hope you will become an active contributor to the community!

    Sincerely,
    500Eboard Management

722.3 partial rebuild

J. M. van Swaay

E500E Guru
Member
Good Morning fellow E500E fans,

I'm currently in the process of a partial rebuild on a 722.369 transmission. I've posted about it on another forum because the tranny did not come out of my 500E. (My 500E has the 722.370--almost identical but with with some special tweaks if I understand the production correctly.)

If other 500Espot members think it would be of interest, I'll move my thread here. My reason for not starting here is because I'm very hesitant to post anything not 500E related.

As usual, I'm in way over my head on this project, I would sure appreciate some input from the experts on this board.

J. M. van Swaay
 
Heck, I posted a long thread about a 560SEC top-end rebuild, and that has nothing to do with an E500E. Since the transmission is so closely related to the E500E unit, I think it is relevant and belongs in this forum.
 
Thanks Gerry, I was hoping you'd say that.

1994 E320 Wagon
722.369 transmission
240,000 miles
original transmission
failed reverse
forward gears normal with perfect shifts
no transmission leaks
fluid changed every 30K miles since new

In the process of a partial rebuild, here's where I am so far:

Removal of rear cover revealed very worn B3 friction discs. I've included a picture of the B3 piston, note the scoring caused by interference with the K1 clutch. The B3 friction bands are paper thin, this is obviously what allowed the B3 piston enough travel to cause the impact with the K1 clutch. I understand this is a very common failure, which leads me to my first question:

Does this kind of damage require a full rebuild to insure no metal in the system? My guess is maybe, but I'd like to hear from the experts. Some additional info, last time I changed the fluid and filter, I noticed some gray streaks when cleaning the pan. So far, disassembly has not revealed any additional evidence of ground up aluminum.

Disassembly of the B3 piston revealed a torn inner lip seal, also a very common failure from what I’ve read. Picture is included with this post. I’m beginning to think that my reverse failure was the result of this lip seal failing, not worn friction discs. I would think that worn discs would result in reverse slowly getting weaker and weaker over several months. With a failed seal it seems logical to expect a more immediate failure. My symptoms were a slow advance of weak reverse, and then immediate failure.

After lots of reading and thinking, I’m unsure just how much rebuilding to do. At a minimum, I’m planning to overhaul the B1, B2, and B3 pistons with new seals, and of course replace the B3 friction discs. I’ll also replace the front side shaft seals.

My dilemma is whether or not to open up the small end (output shaft) of the transmission. Doing so would allow shaft seal replacement and a check/rebuild of the K2 assembly. I’m less concerned about the shaft seals—If I don’t replace them and they start leaking, they can be replaced without removing the transmission.

I’ve checked the free play of the K1 assembly with a feeler gauge as per the FSM, picture included. My value is 1.34 mm, max acceptable value after rebuild is 1.30 mm.

Can I conclude from this measurement that the K1 clutch assembly (and hopefully the K2 clutch assembly) is (are) serviceable?

Anybody have a feel for the likely condition of the K2 assembly?

Thanks for reading.

J. M. van Swaay
 
Pictures.....
 

Attachments

  • K1%20clutch%20measurement.JPG
    K1%20clutch%20measurement.JPG
    49.8 KB · Views: 32
  • B%203piston%20lip%20seal.JPG
    B%203piston%20lip%20seal.JPG
    51.5 KB · Views: 36
  • B3%20brake%20psiton.JPG
    B3%20brake%20psiton.JPG
    46.7 KB · Views: 31
update:

Borrowed vernier caliper from a friend to measure B2 piston free play as per FSM. Free play was about 3.1 mm greater than spec. EPC shows 6 different length piston pins, shortest one is (was) currently installed. Installing 4th longest pin should bring free play back into spec.

I'm concluding from this that the B2 band is about "half" worn out. Not sure if my conclusion is correct but based on this and the K1 measurement, I plan to put it back together as previously described.

Stay tuned.....

J. M. van Swaay
 
Yes I'd like to see the thread...especially anything on uprating for higher torque and power.

Jim.
 
I'm waiting on parts, should have them in the next day or two. When I reassemble, I'll post a few more pictures.

As far as mods go, I'll be putting this back together 100% stock. This tranny is out of our 94 E320 wagon, no need for high performance goodies as this is our primary daily driver.

I'm not sure what's available in terms of performance mods. I think there may a valve body mod for a 100% hydro-mechanical 1st gear start. There may also be some higher end clutch discs available for performance applications but I'm not really sure. Maybe someone else can comment..........

J. M. van Swaay
 

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 2) View details

Back
Top