• Hi Guest !

    Welcome to the 500Eboard forum.

    Since its founding in late 2008, 500Eboard has become the leading resource on the Internet for all things related to the Mercedes-Benz 500E and E500. In recent years, we have also expanded to include the 400E and E420 models, which are directly related to the 500E/E500.

    We invite you to browse and take advantage of the information and resources here on the site. If you find helpful information, please register for full membership, and you'll find even more resources available. Feel free to ask questions, and make liberal use of the "Search" function to find answers.

    We hope you will become an active contributor to the community!

    Sincerely,
    500Eboard Management

I’m considering trying out Transmeister

Rain

1994 040
Member
My reverse delay has gone from ~1 second to ~2-3 seconds... so I’m thinking it’s time to get that looked at. Did a search here on Ted Reich at Transmeister... found a couple people vouching for him. Any of you have him specifically troubleshoot the 500’s reverse delay? And what was the cost?
 
Cant vouch for them. If you are a DIY you can order a rebuilt shipped freight to you from SunValley. I had a transmission shop rebuild mine to keep the numbers the same by vin, and a shop removed it and delivered the rebuilder and installed it. I paid about $4,500 for that rebuild. and install.
 
Cant vouch for them. If you are a DIY you can order a rebuilt shipped freight to you from SunValley. I had a transmission shop rebuild mine to keep the numbers the same by vin, and a shop removed it and delivered the rebuilder and installed it. I paid about $4,500 for that rebuild. and install.
Hoping to keep the costs down by just addressing the reverse delay. Seems to be shifting fine otherwise. But I appreciate the SV recommendation. 👍🏻
 
Well that is depressing! Especially not long after purchase, and with a fairly rapid decline of the delay (can take years to go from 1 second to 2-3).

Reverse delay is usually worn reverse clutches, and/or the reverse piston boot/seal (I think). Problem is, you have to pull the trans out of the car to work on any of this stuff. Labor is the primary cost, gotta be minimum 10-12 hours labor in the R&R alone, not counting whatever time is spent on the transmission itself. And at that point, a rebuild is worth considering, although probably not needed if miles are low.

If the trans comes out, and reverse issue is addressed, make sure it also receives a COMPLETE re-seal... parts and labor are minimal for the re-seal.

Keep us posted on how it turns out!

:strawberry:
 
I used Transmeister 13 years ago to rebuild my S124's transmission. That was about 150K miles ago...recently, the trans has started to leak and the 1-2 shift feels a little weird. Obviously not Transmeister's fault, just time and age. I think Ted recently retired though???
 
Well that is depressing! Especially not long after purchase, and with a fairly rapid decline of the delay (can take years to go from 1 second to 2-3).

Reverse delay is usually worn reverse clutches, and/or the reverse piston boot/seal (I think). Problem is, you have to pull the trans out of the car to work on any of this stuff. Labor is the primary cost, gotta be minimum 10-12 hours labor in the R&R alone, not counting whatever time is spent on the transmission itself. And at that point, a rebuild is worth considering, although probably not needed if miles are low.

If the trans comes out, and reverse issue is addressed, make sure it also receives a COMPLETE re-seal... parts and labor are minimal for the re-seal.

Keep us posted on how it turns out!

:strawberry:
Will do!

And yeah, it’s a bummer. Perhaps I’m mentally exaggerating the 2-3 seconds, and it’s actually 1. Doesn’t feel like I am, though. 😑

I’d hate to have to have the whole thing rebuilt—only 102k miles on the odometer.
 
I used Transmeister 13 years ago to rebuild my S124's transmission. That was about 150K miles ago...recently, the trans has started to leak and the 1-2 shift feels a little weird. Obviously not Transmeister's fault, just time and age. I think Ted recently retired though???
Oh did he? Well maybe I need a new recommendation. 😬
 
I’ve been living for many years with a 2-second reverse delay that I first saw at about 100K miles and around 2008 or so. My car has just under 143K on it now.

A transmission rebuild/repair is not something to do partially or to try to do cheaply. You either remove and rebuild and reseal the entire thing in one fell swoop, or live with it until you can’t anymore (or it fails).

Sun Valley in SoCal will either rebuild your original trans if you ship it to them, or they’ll send you a rebuilt unit from their stock, and you send them back your old one. Your choice.

You need to budget $3-5K for this depending on if you remove the trans yourself, or you have it done at a shop.

Remember my Law: ALL E500Es with >100K miles on them have $10K+ of deferred maintenance.

This amount MUST be factored in at the time of purchase.
 
I’ve been living for many years with a 2-second reverse delay that I first saw at about 100K miles and around 2008 or so. My car has just under 143K on it now.

A transmission rebuild/repair is not something to do partially or to try to do cheaply. You either remove and rebuild and reseal the entire thing in one fell swoop, or live with it until you can’t anymore (or it fails).

Sun Valley in SoCal will either rebuild your original trans if you ship it to them, or they’ll send you a rebuilt unit from their stock, and you send them back your old one. Your choice.
Thanks for the tips, Gerry! Perhaps I’ll follow your lead and wait a while—I didn’t know the 2second reverse could be okay to sit on for a bit. And, makes sense re: doing a transmission repair as one whole rebuild.

Do you have good experience with Sun Valley?
 
Do you have good experience with Sun Valley?
Everything is 100% in this thread, stem to stern.


More info here:


And more info and background:
B60023B9-BC63-486A-A4EE-727473DBF337.jpg
 
It is possible to DIY reverse clutches on the 722.3 if you are so inclined. Indeed I'd rather do it myself in super cleanliness and using genuine MB parts than let someone else at it.

This thread view takes you there pretty much. With pump out it's pretty easy to fit new reverse clutches and have it fixed. It is usually the reverse that wear out on the 722.3 so if it were me I would of course inspect all frictions and steels first but chances are it will only require reverse clutches not a full rebuild.

Thread 'HOW-TO: 722.3 External Re-Seal' HOW-TO: 722.3 External Re-Seal | Transmission and Driveline
 
It is possible to DIY reverse clutches on the 722.3 if you are so inclined. Indeed I'd rather do it myself in super cleanliness and using genuine MB parts than let someone else at it.

This thread view takes you there pretty much. With pump out it's pretty easy to fit new reverse clutches and have it fixed. It is usually the reverse that wear out on the 722.3 so if it were me I would of course inspect all frictions and steels first but chances are it will only require reverse clutches not a full rebuild.

Thread 'HOW-TO: 722.3 External Re-Seal' HOW-TO: 722.3 External Re-Seal | Transmission and Driveline
Thanks for that additional perspective—sounds like I’ve got some decision-making ahead. And some more homework to do. 👍🏻 I’ll take a look at that how-to this weekend. 🌧
 
It is possible to DIY reverse clutches on the 722.3 if you are so inclined. Indeed I'd rather do it myself in super cleanliness and using genuine MB parts than let someone else at it.

This thread view takes you there pretty much. With pump out it's pretty easy to fit new reverse clutches and have it fixed. It is usually the reverse that wear out on the 722.3 so if it were me I would of course inspect all frictions and steels first but chances are it will only require reverse clutches not a full rebuild.

Thread 'HOW-TO: 722.3 External Re-Seal' HOW-TO: 722.3 External Re-Seal | Transmission and Driveline
I think it is absolutely crazy to spend the time and effort to remove and replace a transmission, only and just to repair the reverse clutches.

Far better while it’s out to reseal the exterior and also replace all of the friction and wear parts, inspect everything, etc. while it’s out.

The last thing one would want is to R&R the transmission for a single repair, and then have to remove it again a year later for another issue or to reseal leaks.

Also, you are not being very realistic with your assumption that anyone on this forum can and has the will, know-how and tools to R&R and more importantly REPAIR their own transmission. I would say perhaps 1-2% of people here can oe have done that. I have yet even to see the @gsxr publish any sort of info or HOW-TO on a comprehensive transmission rebuild. An external re-seal or tactical reverse clutch replacement or torque converter replacement, sure.

But no one on this forum to my knowledge has ever published any sort of HOW-TO where they completely tore down their transmission and rebuilt and replaced every wear part with new.

I think we need to be careful not to trivialize what is actually quite a complex job that many if not most folks here would not even try to attempt. Rightfully so.

Foe many members here, I think it would go as far as removing their transmission and sending it out for repair, and then re-installing it themself. For others, and what I’ve seen by far most commonly over the years, is to have a shop do 100% of all the labor and repair work. Which is why I said to budget $5K for this job, or $3K if doing one’s own R&R.

Even doing one’s own R&R isn’t a particularly fun job, even with a HOW-TO as a guide.
 
It is possible to DIY reverse clutches on the 722.3 if you are so inclined. Indeed I'd rather do it myself in super cleanliness and using genuine MB parts than let someone else at it.
I second that entirely! The thread in the link is very nice and useful. (y)

I agree with @gerryvz too, but I would like to stress that doing a transmission is not hard. I did one in 6 weeks w/o rushing. The work on the transmission is very pleasant, getting it off the car and putting it back on it is what I don't like. Using only MB parts the cost was ~ $1000 . Is very important to have the right procedure (which I do have). However, I scrapped the car before using the transmission, so I never get to enjoy the transmission. I know I did couple of mistakes and will have to open it up again, but overall is not hard although is not a job for the average guy too. I look forward to when I have to do my next one, I may end up doing a how-to too.

In this particular case I would say keep an eye on it. If it gets worse then you'll have to bite the bullet. Depending on mileage, how the rest of the transmission works, how mechanically inclined you are, how much work and money you want to put into it plus other personal factors, you will decide what path is best for you to take, but you do have several options to consider from. (y)
 
I think it is absolutely crazy to spend the time and effort to remove and replace a transmission, only and just to repair the reverse clutches.

Far better while it’s out to reseal the exterior and also replace all of the friction and wear parts, inspect everything, etc. while it’s out.

The last thing one would want is to R&R the transmission for a single repair, and then have to remove it again a year later for another issue or to reseal leaks.

Also, you are not being very realistic with your assumption that anyone on this forum can and has the will, know-how and tools to R&R and more importantly REPAIR their own transmission. I would say perhaps 1-2% of people here can oe have done that. I have yet even to see the @gsxr publish any sort of info or HOW-TO on a comprehensive transmission rebuild. An external re-seal or tactical reverse clutch replacement or torque converter replacement, sure.

But no one on this forum to my knowledge has ever published any sort of HOW-TO where they completely tore down their transmission and rebuilt and replaced every wear part with new.

I think we need to be careful not to trivialize what is actually quite a complex job that many if not most folks here would not even try to attempt. Rightfully so.

Foe many members here, I think it would go as far as removing their transmission and sending it out for repair, and then re-installing it themself. For others, and what I’ve seen by far most commonly over the years, is to have a shop do 100% of all the labor and repair work. Which is why I said to budget $5K for this job, or $3K if doing one’s own R&R.

Even doing one’s own R&R isn’t a particularly fun job, even with a HOW-TO as a guide.
Yes except that I have taken several transmissions apart for refurbushment in my car's and found that the clutches are in new condition! Some with writing still on them!! You measure the clearances in each clutch pack and compare with factory specs. I have yet to see one of my transmission out of spec yet on any clutch pack.

Indeed new frictions can come with LESS material on them than the original little MB ones still have :rugby:

I think a full rebuild is mostly overkill for most folks UNLESSS you are talking about a transmission with high miles and negleted services etc they are usually fairly robust. And you could well get a transmission back with less material on some frictions due to some (not all) new clutches coming like that.

Anyway not getting into a debate about it that's all I have to say on the matter.
 
It's really not hard to change the reverse clutches BTW - when doing a full reseal. That is what I would do now knowing what I know from working at mine before. Any further work is likely to be wateful unless high miler.

People think transmissions are a dark art and cannot be touched unless "Full rebuild" by specialists. Those are people who have not worked at their own before because once you do you will see it is not a huge deal at all.
 
I second that entirely! The thread in the link is very nice and useful. (y)

I agree with @gerryvz too, but I would like to stress that doing a transmission is not hard. I did one in 6 weeks w/o rushing. The work on the transmission is very pleasant, getting it off the car and putting it back on it is what I don't like. Using only MB parts the cost was ~ $1000 . Is very important to have the right procedure (which I do have). However, I scrapped the car before using the transmission, so I never get to enjoy the transmission. I know I did couple of mistakes and will have to open it up again, but overall is not hard although is not a job for the average guy too. I look forward to when I have to do my next one, I may end up doing a how-to too.

In this particular case I would say keep an eye on it. If it gets worse then you'll have to bite the bullet. Depending on mileage, how the rest of the transmission works, how mechanically inclined you are, how much work and money you want to put into it plus other personal factors, you will decide what path is best for you to take, but you do have several options to consider from. (y)
+1! Having someone else do the job you don't really know exactly what went into your transmission.

A HOW-TO on 722.3 rebuild would be awesome and dispell some myths that these are magic boxes that shant be touched.

As an example on my w140 with 722.6 I wanted to carry out the repair and rebuild myself so as I could upgrade the internals and all recommended new improved parts from MB. I would NOT have got this level of care giving it to someone else and it also cost considerably less for me to DIY it but that was not the driving factor. Early 722.6 rebuild / updated parts questions

I would implore many of the highly capable members here to snag yourself a used 722.3 etc cheap and do your own tear down! Or better yet, rebuild it at your leisure as a replacement unit for your own car. There are many comprehensive free PDF manuals available online and below
 

Attachments

I agree 110% with @JC220, there is no "black magic" about those transmissions. I followed the 722.3 manual that he posted and it could not be easier. However, later I found out that I missed something, which actually the manual does not show. Can't remember right now what exactly that was.

I agree with JC220 again: to replace the reverse piston seal and clutches you don't have to dig deep in the transmission. They are just behind the pump (which is why the reverse starts dying first: the heat from the engine is greater in that part of the transmission). Repairing the reverse is only a few hundred $ expense, but once the transmission is out @Rain will be at a crossroads: go with a full rebuild or do only the reverse. Only he can make that call.
 
And yeah, it’s a bummer. Perhaps I’m mentally exaggerating the 2-3 seconds, and it’s actually 1. Doesn’t feel like I am, though. 😑

I’d hate to have to have the whole thing rebuilt—only 102k miles on the odometer.
Check it with a stopwatch. It may feel like longer than it really is. 3-4 seconds feels like eternity. When it's that bad, you are on borrowed time. When you can hear a light "whirring" noise during this 3-4 seconds, it's overdue. Need to have radio off and door/window open to hear this. I think the noise is from the reverse piston touching things it shouldn't. But anyway, if the delay is less than 2 seconds, or closer to 1 second, I'd leave it alone. There's no way the trans should need a full rebuild at 102k, assuming it's original to the car (check the serial number vs the datacard), if it had proper fluid & filter changes.



I agree 110% with @JC220, there is no "black magic" about those transmissions. I followed the 722.3 manual that he posted and it could not be easier. However, later I found out that I missed something, which actually the manual does not show. Can't remember right now what exactly that was.
if you can remember what the manual was missing, please let us know!



I agree with JC220 again: to replace the reverse piston seal and clutches you don't have to dig deep in the transmission. They are just behind the pump (which is why the reverse starts dying first: the heat from the engine is greater in that part of the transmission). Repairing the reverse is only a few hundred $ expense, but once the transmission is out @Rain will be at a crossroads: go with a full rebuild or do only the reverse. Only he can make that call.
Not mentioned here, but if you do the reverse clutches only, remove 4-5 of the 20 reverse piston springs. This is a common modification by the trans rebuilders to help the reverse clutches last longer, and (IIRC) may also reduce the delay for reverse engagement as the pressure required to compress the spring pack is reduced.
 
if you can remember what the manual was missing, please let us know!
I checked the exploded view and my pictures. Is the K2 drum (item 550 in the attached exploded view)! What happens is that Mercedes sells it as one part already assembled, but inside there is a rubber o-ring. During a transmission reseal that o-ring should be changed. The FRM that @JC220 posted (which is also what I followed) does not show that because the part is riveted so is assumed you can't open it. This video shows what this is about:

I looked at all the comments and replies and could not see where the o-ring size is listed. I asked the question in the comments, but the answer I received does offer the o-ring size.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Thanks, liviu165! Any idea what problems result if that O-ring is old/worn/hardened?

Also, do you know roughly what year MB changed to the late-style drum he shows near the end, held together with a snap ring instead of rivets?

I'm curious if this only applies to 80's-vintage transmissions.

:scratchchin:
 
C'mon guys, you're not making sense for the majority of people here.

Again, all of you are making assumptions about the willingness of members here to actually do this work. Sure, all of you guys have no issue with it (and I also intend to do my own when it comes time, and already have most of the parts), but again, you are among the 2% here who have actually rebuilt your own transmissions. And NONE of you have done comprehensive HOW-TO articles on it.

For the last time -- 98% of the people I've seen on this forum, during its 12+ years in existence, and with 500Ecstasy before it dating from 2003, have had:

a) a dealer or independent shop remove and replace their transmission, and either the shop rebuilds it or if they can't, they farm it out to a local transmission shop or send it to a specialist like Sun Valley. This is what most people here do.

b) the car's owner (if inclined) removes and re-installs their own transmission in their garage, either farming it out to a transmission specialist (Sun Valley) or to a local transmission shop. This is much less common than (a) above.

It's easy to assume that everyone has the same levels of technical capbility, space, tools, and gumption as you do. But the simple fact is that most people here don't even want to bother with rebuilding their own transmission. Doesn't mean that they CAN'T, or that they have zero technical knowledge, it's just something they'd rather pay an expert to do. I can't blame them for this. Who wants their car out of commission for six weeks while rebuilding, when it can be out of commission for a week or two and have someone else do the R&R work, while Sun Valley ships a rebuilt unit to the shop?

Even @liviu165 mentions above there are things he would (or will) re-do after doing his own transmission. So even the "master transmission rebuilder" gurus among us, make errors or want to change things they did.

I can tell all of you, with certainty, that NO ONE on this forum is going to want to either do (a) or (b) above, and repair the singular issue at hand, only to have another issue pop up a year or two later, requiring them to pull themself or pay to have the transmission pulled yet again for something they could have done right the first time. Nobody pays to have ONLY/JUST the transmission reverse fixed. They pay a transmission shop to rebuild. the. damn. box. The ENTIRE box.

Do you think I'd ship my transmission (whether it had 100K on it when the symptoms first appeared, or now at 142.8k miles) to Marc at Sun Valley and say, "Hey Marc, my reverse is bad, can you fix that and reseal the exterior while you're at it?" NO. I'm going to say "Marc, my reverse is bad. Can you please rebuild the box so that everything is as new and operating correctly?"

Would you replace ONE motor mount, and ignore the other one just because it isn't on the "compression" side of the engine bay that the engine torques onto?

Would you remove the dashboard and replace two of the six ACC pods, and leave the others just because they tested out fine and held vacuum? Or better yet, would you remove the dashboard and everything to replace the evaporator core, and NOT replace the ACC pods?

Also, losing reverse gear and/or external ATF leaks are NOT the only issues with 722.3 transmissions, despite they may be the most common problems. Vacuum elements go out, and in some failure scenarios (like I once experienced with an E320 wagon), the forward gears give out while reverse is just fine. With any transmission over 100K miles, things can happen. Doesn't mean they WILL happen, or SHOULD happen, but they CAN happen. Conversely, my 560SEC transmission is still going strong after 250K miles, zero rebuilds.

I'm not trying to poo-poo what you guys are saying, but I am trying to take this from the simple perspective of @Rain and others on the forum who are looking for options. Rain may indeed want to pull his own transmission and fix it. That's certainly one option. The other options are also well-outlined, to have someone else do ALL or SOME of the work, and Rain do some of the work.

But it is just wrong and irresponsible to make a blanket assumption that it's no damn big deal for anyone here to pull a transmission, fix the reverse, re-seal it, and re-install it as casually as you do. That isn't how life works, particularly for many people here. Try to look at this from a more "pedestrian" perspective of the average E500E owner.
 
Gerry, we are offering solutions/options that come down from few thousands to only few hundreds! We thought is a good thing. :)

I can't speak for others, but for me a big job is only a matter of inconvenience, nothing more. Question: What's the difference between a job that takes 2 days vs. one that takes 5 days? Answer: 3 days, nothing more.

Just because most people do things one way (the same way for years) does not mean it can't be done differently and better, otherwise where is the progress? So, w/o intention of starting a philosophical discussion about progress, I would say that instead of blending the 2% in the 98%, maybe we can bring some from the 98% into the 2% so we can make it 4%.

Now, if y'all can excuse me, I got to go back to my differential. Cheers! :beerchug:

IMG_20201231_122531.jpg
 
Let's not get unhinged here and put this into reverse :choochoo:

Don't disagree with what anyone said here its just different perspectives there is no right are wrong answers. The job can be approached from different angles with the same outcome - you have sun valley over there which seems like a good choice too.
 
@Rain's original enquiry related to asking about Transmeister. This leads me to believe that he is seriously considering his options (per his post: recommendations) relating to having SOMEONE ELSE do the work. First with Transmeister, second with Sun Valley.

If you read my first post, I said that I believe he can actually live with the problem for some time to come. And that is my recommendation, which GSXR elaborated on with even mo' / betta' information.

Living with this is what I have been doing, and the eventual failure is what I have prepared in large part for (to do the FULL repair job myself).

Nothing wrong with outlining the options. But don't make assumptions that everyone is as desirous as you are to do this job, as history proves that this is not usually the case. (I'm on your side on this, becuase I PLAN to do this job myself when I am forced to!).

Only @Rain can speak for himself and what he intends to do (the job himself, or looking to farm it out wholly or partially). But I don't want to see the "this is an easy job" advice of the 2% of folks here who have done it, cause someone to get in over their head.
 
Thanks, liviu165! Any idea what problems result if that O-ring is old/worn/hardened?

Also, do you know roughly what year MB changed to the late-style drum he shows near the end, held together with a snap ring instead of rivets?

I'm curious if this only applies to 80's-vintage transmissions.

:scratchchin:
I think it looses pressure and the piston has a hard time pushing into the clutches, that resulting in slipping.

I don't know what year, but I think his comment with the "early years" was about the K1 drum that was changed to the snap ring version, not the K2 drum.

Probably the early 80s transmissions had the K1 rivetted. The transmission I resealed was from a '89 and had the snap ring version of K1 but the riveted K2. It also had the new style B2 piston, which really surprised me.
-----------------------------------------------------
Sorry guys, I didn't mean to highjack the thread.
 
I can only speak for myself and my own trials and tribulations with the 6.9 transmission. The previous owner of my 6.9 had a "rebuild" done by a shop here in Vancouver at huge expense (bill was $7K+ CAD and this was more than 10 years ago:shock:). I will not get into what I think of this "shop" but they are well known half - wits charging exorbitant rates for sub - par work. I cannot tell from the hand - scribbled job sheet exactly what was done, but I do not see evidence of a refurb from a reputable shop like Sun Valley, which leads me to believe they "tried" to do the rebuild themselves. Since my ownership I have had to drop the valve body, and also tinker a lot with the linkages and modulator, in additon to fixing multiple other half - assed attempts that this shop tried to do, and rob the previous owner blind in the process. So I am kind of on the fence on this thread to be honest. If I had tons of time on my hands, and a clean and large enough work bench and all required tools, then I might be inclined to do this job myself, but I have to concur with Gerry here in that there is no way I would not go the whole hog if ever I had to fix this trans. The re/re on the 6.9 is not for the faint of heart, and most folks pull the motor and trans as a unit to do this, so to not refurb the whole box would be more than false economy here.
Likely I will search out a competent shop to do the re/re if I ever have to do this (praying that this day never comes...), but for sure then I will get Sun Valley to do the job itself. Just my 2c.
 
Last edited:
I learned how to rebuild transmissions when I was in trade school. It's definitely not a "dark art". However, that being said, in the interest of cost and convenience if I was ever presented with a need to replace a transmission I would order a rebuilt one from Sun Valley and probably farm out the R&R locally as I don't have a lift and would be hard pressed to get the car high enough to do the R&R.

Automatic transmissions, while amazing devices, aren't difficult to work on. But - unless you have a dedicated place to do it that's surgically clean and all the requisite tools, it just doesn't present itself as a DIY sort of job. There are too many places things can go south that you won't know until you get it back in the car, making it even more of a nightmare job.

I like to think of it as transferring risk. To someone else.

Dan
 
I learned how to rebuild transmissions when I was in trade school. It's definitely not a "dark art". However, that being said, in the interest of cost and convenience if I was ever presented with a need to replace a transmission I would order a rebuilt one from Sun Valley and probably farm out the R&R locally as I don't have a lift and would be hard pressed to get the car high enough to do the R&R.

Automatic transmissions, while amazing devices, aren't difficult to work on. But - unless you have a dedicated place to do it that's surgically clean and all the requisite tools, it just doesn't present itself as a DIY sort of job. There are too many places things can go south that you won't know until you get it back in the car, making it even more of a nightmare job.

I like to think of it as transferring risk. To someone else.

Dan
Basically what I was trying to say. It's not a job that most people WANT to do, for a variety of reasons. Not a job that is physically or mentally impossible to do for competent DIYers.

It's not too difficult to get a car high enough (even on jack stands) to do the R&R. I successfully did it on my garage floor with jack stands on my former E320 wagon. I had to take the removed transmission off of the trans jack to get it out from under the car, and vice versa to get it back into position under the car, but one person can wrestle a 722.3 around without TOO much difficulty.

What I've found is that the "big" jobs that I've done, like doing the M117 cylinder heads, M104 head, E320 transmission R&R, and the more recent Top-End Refresh of my E500 have given me the confidence that I can do pretty much anything, including a transmission.

The most important thing is to pass the knowledge gleaned on to other people, so they can do same, if so inclined.
 
I used Transmeister 13 years ago to rebuild my S124's transmission. That was about 150K miles ago...recently, the trans has started to leak and the 1-2 shift feels a little weird. Obviously not Transmeister's fault, just time and age. I think Ted recently retired though???
@Rain, Glen is correct. Ted Reich retired a couple of years back. He was great on 124 trans he did my last fluid and filter change on my 500E. He also rebuilt my 500SL and did a reverse clutch in my old 300E.

BUT, for sure he no longer is in business.


:runexe:
 
One other point of clarification. Anyone willing to tackle the R&R (which is the WORST part of the job), can handle the external re-seal, which is relatively straightforward. Some tools need to be purchase or fabricated for the front pump disassembly, but that's about it.

Doing a full teardown and rebuild is a very different story. As mentioned above, it's not rocket surgery, but would be very very time consuming. If you have a couple months of spare time and a spotless work area, it's doable - multiple people on various forums have done it and posted photos of the process. (Disclaimer - I've not done it myself, yet.) This option is definitely not for everyone, and if you screw up, you get to pull the trans out again, AND take it apart to see what went wrong. Of course if the rebuilder screws up you still are on the hook for the labor to R&R, they only warranty their work, not the R&R (unless you pay a shop to R&R).

:seesaw:
 
It is possible to DIY reverse clutches on the 722.3 if you are so inclined. Indeed I'd rather do it myself in super cleanliness and using genuine MB parts than let someone else at it.

...I would like to stress that doing a transmission is not hard. I did one in 6 weeks w/o rushing. The work on the transmission is very pleasant, getting it off the car and putting it back on it is what I don't like. Using only MB parts the cost was ~ $1000 . Is very important to have the right procedure...

C'mon guys, you're not making sense for the majority of people here.

Again, all of you are making assumptions about the willingness of members here to actually do this work....

I learned how to rebuild transmissions when I was in trade school. It's definitely not a "dark art". However, that being said, in the interest of cost and convenience if I was ever presented with a need to replace a transmission I would order a rebuilt one from Sun Valley and probably farm out the R&R locally as I don't have a lift and would be hard pressed to get the car high enough to do the R&R...
Yeah, total hats off to you guys who have the fortitude to push themselves to do such repair jobs -- no doubt you would not be in the position you are today to tackle R&R of a transmission had you not pushed yourself to tackle incrementally more and more involved repair jobs in years past!

Personally, in my middle age, I'm too chicken to get underneath the car at home --- especially without a lift. I would say that I tolerate wrenching and enjoy the self-satisfaction it gives. But, I do not look forward to doing it --- I do not love it. As @LWB250 intimates, I'd rather spend some and transfer that risk of trans R&R to someone who has lots of practice under their belt. :-)
 
Yeah, total hats off to you guys who have the fortitude to push themselves to do such repair jobs -- no doubt you would not be in the position you are today to tackle R&R of a transmission had you not pushed yourself to tackle incrementally more and more involved repair jobs in years past!

Personally, in my middle age, I'm too chicken to get underneath the car at home --- especially without a lift. I would say that I tolerate wrenching and enjoy the self-satisfaction it gives. But, I do not look forward to doing it --- I do not love it. As @LWB250 intimates, I'd rather spend some and transfer that risk of trans R&R to someone who has lots of practice under their belt. :)
I think your post speaks for far more people on this forum than you know, with regard to wrenching in general, and R&Ring a transmission in particular, @Jlaa.
 
Back in 2015, when I lived in CA, Sun Valley charged me about $2,500 to remove, rebuild, and reinstall my transmission. Rear gear went completely out not too long after engagement delay reached 2 seconds. Forward gears shifted fine.

A year+ ago in Virginia it cost me $4k for the exact same procedure with local shop.
 
Back in 2015, when I lived in CA, Sun Valley charged me about $2,500 to remove, rebuild, and reinstall my transmission. Rear gear went completely out not too long after engagement delay reached 2 seconds. Forward gears shifted fine.
Ohhhh. How long did it take for Sun Valley to do the work? When my transmission goes, maybe instead of having a local place R&R with a new one shipped from Sun Valley, I should just drive to Sun Valley and have them take the car ---- assuming it doesn't take much more than two days?
 
Seems like an awful lot of driving !!

Much easier to have Sun Valley ship it to you/your shop. They have quite a few transmissions for various models already rebuilt on their shelves, ready to go. They'll also rebuild YOUR transmission if you send it to them, and want to keep the numbers matching. If they don't have one made up, they have hundreds of cores available and will make one for you within a day or two, and then ship it out.
 
Ohhhh. How long did it take for Sun Valley to do the work? When my transmission goes, maybe instead of having a local place R&R with a new one shipped from Sun Valley, I should just drive to Sun Valley and have them take the car ---- assuming it doesn't take much more than two days?
If I remember correctly, I could pick my car up after just 3-4 days. Unfortunately, it was not a successful rebuild, and transmission innards were pulverized after 7k mi - someone has to draw that one unlucky card from the deck. Hence another rebuild when I was already in Virginia. What I'm not sure to this day is whether my valve body was refurbished too or not, (and whether it was the cause for the failure, as it was revealed to be in very bad shape during autopsy) and if it's refurbishment reflected in the $2,500 price. That's is something you'll want to clarify upfront. My receipt said "full rebuild" without any other details and I did not ask.
 
If I remember correctly, I could pick my car up after just 3-4 days. Unfortunately, it was not a successful rebuild, and transmission innards were pulverized after 7k mi - someone has to draw that one unlucky card from the deck. Hence another rebuild when I was already in Virginia. What I'm not sure to this day is whether my valve body was refurbished too or not, (and whether it was the cause for the failure, as it was revealed to be in very bad shape during autopcy) and if it's refurbishment reflected in the $2,500 price. That's is something you'll want to clarify upfront. My receipt said "full rebuild" without any other details and I did not ask.
Oh so you paid $2500 for Sun Valley to do a complete rebuild, and then had to pay another $4000 to have it rebuilt again 3 years later? 😳😞
 
Oh so you paid $2500 for Sun Valley to do a complete rebuild, and then had to pay another $4000 to have it rebuilt again 3 years later? 😳😞
Yes, but statistically it's bound to happen to someone. Despite being out of warranty (24 months) owner offered to ship a replacement unit for free, but I still had to pay a local shop remove& install labor (IIRC, $1400-1700). I decided to go with a local shop, as my 400E is a DD and I had to rent a car. Thus, waiting for SV transmission would take longerand eat into the savings. Most importantly, I wanted to have a local warranty. If, god-forbid, replacement SV unit would turn out problematic, I would have to jump out of the window 😁

As it turned out, I had to use the warranty 😁. Shifts weren't smooth, with some thumping and jerking, and so after several months Virginia shop pulled the transmission and rebuilt it again.
 
Yes, but statistically it's bound to happen to someone. Despite being out of warranty (24 months) owner offered to ship a replacement unit for free, but I still had to pay a local shop remove& install labor (IIRC, $1400-1700). I decided to go with a local shop, as my 400E is a DD and I had to rent a car. Thus, waiting for SV transmission would take longerand eat into the savings. Most importantly, I wanted to have a local warranty. If, god-forbid, replacement SV unit would turn out problematic, I would have to jump out of the window 😁

As it turned out, I had to use the warranty 😁. Shifts weren't smooth, with some thumping and jerking, and so after several months Virginia shop pulled the transmission and rebuilt it again.
Yikes! So 3 rebuilds within 7k miles?!
 
Yikes! So 3 rebuilds within 7k miles?!
Well, 3 rebuilds within ~17k miles. I drove about 10k over the course of several months (8-10? I forgot) before 3rd rebuilt. Over those 10k mi thumping/jerking got progressively worse.
 
Well, 2 rebuilds within ~17k miles. I drove about 10k over the course of several months (8-10? I forgot) before 3rd rebuilt. Over those 10k mi thumping/jerking got progressively worse.
Ouch. Sorry to hear. 😞 3 rebuilds... you’re definitely due a good hand dealt.
 
Yeah, incredibly inconvenient, time consuming and stressful. But it's what it is. Just unlucky.

I fixed a typo: 3 rebuilds in 17k miles, not 2
I had a similar issue w/ Ted @ Transmeister. After he rebuilt my 107 500SL it kept flaring from 2nd to third. He took it apart a couple of times and could never find the problem. When I picked it up after the third time he had installed a different transmission. ALL at NO COST to me. Ted was a stand up guy. The replaced trans worked perfectly.

BTW, What I learned from this experience and from spending time w/ Ted was that re-builders do not always put in new parts. Ted had 100s of parts from dis-assembled transmissions on the shelf that he deemed GOOD. Some of these parts would end up in his rebuilds.

What I take away from this experience IS; If you think you are getting a fully re- built tranny with all new parts you are probably wrong.

I think you could INSIST on all new parts but the price would probably increase accordingly. Also even a trans w/ all new parts could have problems. A used part may actually work better than a new one. The trans guy is supposed to be the expert and decides what is the right approach.

I would say if you want a truly new trans buy it from Mercedes.

Whatever you decide to do make sure you have a GOOD WARRANTY in writing.

Just my $0.02
 
BTW, What I learned from this experience and from spending time w/ Ted was that re-builders do not always put in new parts. ... What I take away from this experience IS; If you think you are getting a fully re- built tranny with all new parts you are probably wrong.
This is likely true of many rebuilders, although I don't know Sun Valley's normal procedures. Related anecdote: About 10 years ago, a family member had a 722.3 (M119) trans rebuild by Schmid in San Francisco area. The car wasn't driven much for a couple years and the trans started acting up, just outside warranty. I found the vacuum modulator and O/L switch were original from the early 90's!!! Schmid had cheaped out and did not install new ones. I was not impressed. Replacing those items fixed most of the issues, but one shift oddity remained, slowing to ~20mph and accelerating (i.e., slowing on a 55mph road to turn onto a side road) resulted in a flare & bang as the trans downshifted from 4th to 2nd. Swapping valve bodies did not change anything, best I can tell something was not adjusted properly inside. The trans otherwise worked OK but I still haven't figured out a cure for the 4-2 downshift, but there is a TSB on it I need to try.


I think you could INSIST on all new parts but the price would probably increase accordingly. Also even a trans w/ all new parts could have problems. A used part may actually work better than a new one. The trans guy is supposed to be the expert and decides what is the right approach.
I agree, if you did insist on all new parts, the price may increase substantially. But it's worth asking.


I would say if you want a truly new trans buy it from Mercedes.
I vaguely remember hearing something that even MB rebuilt transmissions aren't always as good as the originals from the 90's, but they are likely a safer bet than aftermarket rebuilds, and should have all new components. But dealer rebuilt transmissions are EXPENSIVE, and require purchase of a rebuilt torque converter or Mercedes won't warranty it. Looks like current pricing for both (trans+converter) from the dealer is ±$6,000 USD total. (!!!!) Not including labor.

:spend: :spend: :spend:
 
If the transmission still in my previously well maintained 90K mile ‘92 400E (light front end hit) parts car were sitting on the ground ready to load for pickup, or if necessary ship, is there the demand, and what might it be worth?
TiA
689D4AE7-187B-47B5-AD57-58944675D60A.jpeg
 
I had a similar issue w/ Ted @ Transmeister. After he rebuilt my 107 500SL it kept flaring from 2nd to third. He took it apart a couple of times and could never find the problem. When I picked it up after the third time he had installed a different transmission. ALL at NO COST to me. Ted was a stand up guy. The replaced trans worked perfectly.

BTW, What I learned from this experience and from spending time w/ Ted was that re-builders do not always put in new parts. Ted had 100s of parts from dis-assembled transmissions on the shelf that he deemed GOOD. Some of these parts would end up in his rebuilds.

What I take away from this experience IS; If you think you are getting a fully re- built tranny with all new parts you are probably wrong.

I think you could INSIST on all new parts but the price would probably increase accordingly. Also even a trans w/ all new parts could have problems. A used part may actually work better than a new one. The trans guy is supposed to be the expert and decides what is the right approach.

I would say if you want a truly new trans buy it from Mercedes.

Whatever you decide to do make sure you have a GOOD WARRANTY in writing.

Just my $0.02

This is likely true of many rebuilders, although I don't know Sun Valley's normal procedures. Related anecdote: About 10 years ago, a family member had a 722.3 trans rebuild by Schmid in San Francisco area. The car wasn't driven much for a couple years and the trans started acting up, just outside warranty. I found the vacuum modulator and O/L switch were original from the early 90's!!! They cheaped out and did not install new ones. I was not impressed. Replacing those items fixed most of the issues, but one shift oddity remained, slowing to ~20mph and accelerating (i.e., slowing on a 55mph road to turn onto a side road) resulted in a flare & bang as the trans shifted from 4th to 2nd. Swapping valve bodies did not change anything, best I can tell something was not adjusted properly inside.

I agree, if you did insist on all new parts, the price may increase substantially. But it's worth asking.

I vaguely remember hearing something that even MB rebuilt transmissions aren't always as good as the originals from the 90's, but they are likely a safer bet than aftermarket rebuilds, and should have all new components. But they are EXPENSIVE, and require purchase of a rebuilt torque converter or they won't warranty it. Looks like current pricing for both from the dealer is ±$6,000 USD total. (!!!!) Not including labor.

:spend: :spend: :spend:
I can tell you with 100% certainty that "rebuilders" such as Peter Schmid (SF Bay Area) and Sun Valley (SoCal) "re-use" used parts that are deemed to be good, in their rebuilds. I have seen freshly rebuilt transmissions from Schmid that have been torn apart, that clearly had re-used components that technically should have been replaced. This courtesy of Robert Fenton. Which is one reason why Fenton many years ago stopped buying rebuilds from Schmid.

In more recent years, he also had a pretty bad experience with Sun Valley, I believe on a transmission for an older car (a 6.9 or a 6.3 or something from that era).

When I visited Sun Valley, I will say that I saw a LOT of brand-new MB parts all over the place, too. And the transmission that I received from them for my former E320 wagon, had at least new external components (vacuum modulator, bowden cable, external seals, etc.).

The main problem is that it is VERY VERY expensive to maintain a stock of new MB or OEM rebuild parts. And MORE importantly, it would probably double the cost of any said "rebuild" to replace everything inside with brand-new components. So, corners are cut, and components are re-used, particularly on the internals where the customer won't see them, and they may or may not be good.

I've had many many conversations about rebuilt transmissions with Robert Fenton, over dinner and such. He has always said that the very best transmission you will ever find, is one that comes from MB as an original 722.3 transmission in a car, or a removed original transmission with under about 60-75K miles on it.

The next best thing -- but noticeably/measurably not quite as good -- is an MB factory rebuilt transmission.

After that, would be the "rebuilds" that you get either from local specialists or from MB specialists like Schmid, European Exchange or Sun Valley.

Robert always told me that once an original transmission is worn out, it can be rebuilt even super well, but it will never be quite as good as the day it left the factory originally. I trust his judgement on this matter.

Cheers,
Gerry

P.S. I think this also makes the point that @JC220 and @liviu165 said earlier, about wanting to do one's own transmission, becuase then YOU control the parts that go into it, and YOU make the decisions, and if something goes bad, YOU only have YOURSELF to blame for it. Something to be said for that.

P.P.S. One thing that I have seen, with the rebuilders, particularly with Sun Valley and markedly less so with Peter Schmid, is that they will take the transmission back and either try to fix it, or will ship out another one to replace a faulty rebuild. I've heard some horror stories about Schmid honoring a "warranty" and wanting to take a defective rebuilt box back. I've seen a number of cases where Sun Valley shipped out a replacement box that same day when a rebuilt box was not working correctly.
 
To my mind, unless you own a low mileage garage queen that you intend to sell at some point for a speculative profit, I don’t see why it wouldn’t be the easiest/cleanest/qualitatively superior route to just get a remanufactured transmission from MB and be done with it. Yeah, numbers won’t match anymore, but that only comes into play if you have and plan to sell a low mileage unicorn. And even under that scenario, if I were in the market for a 500E, I’d prefer the car that has receipts for a MB remanufactured transmission vs. a third party rebuilt.

My car has 101k miles on it and a 2 sec delay when reversing- had that since I bought it at 87k miles. This delay has been increasingly bugging me and once it gets too much, I plan to buy the remanufactured transmission from MB and be done with it without any “matching number concerns” whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
To my mind, unless you own a low mileage garage queen that you intend to sell at some point for a speculative profit, I don’t see why it wouldn’t be the easiest/cleanest/qualitatively superior route to just get a remanufactured transmission from MB and be done with it. Yeah, numbers won’t match anymore, but that only comes into play if you plan to sell and have a low mileage unicorn. And even under that scenario, if I were in the market for a 500E, I’d prefer the car that has receipts for a MB remanufactured transmission vs. a third party rebuilt.

My car has 101k miles on it and a 2 sec delay when reversing- had that since I bought it at 87k miles. This delay has been increasingly bugging me and once it gets too much, I plan to buy the remanufactured transmission from MB and be done with it without any “matching number concerns” whatsoever.
Have you looked into pricing for a MB remanufactured one?
 

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 3) View details

Back
Top