• Hi Guest !

    Welcome to the 500Eboard forum.

    Since its founding in late 2008, 500Eboard has become the leading resource on the Internet for all things related to the Mercedes-Benz 500E and E500. In recent years, we have also expanded to include the 400E and E420 models, which are directly related to the 500E/E500.

    We invite you to browse and take advantage of the information and resources here on the site. If you find helpful information, please register for full membership, and you'll find even more resources available. Feel free to ask questions, and make liberal use of the "Search" function to find answers.

    We hope you will become an active contributor to the community!

    Sincerely,
    500Eboard Management

Approved ATF Discussion for 722.3 Transmission

Jono likes Pentosin 1ATF for 722.6 tranny.
Just changed fluid, filter, and electrical connector fitting on the 01' E320 wagon.

First change? How many miles? I’ve been doing mine every 60k (my version of “lifetime”), but just using the MB OEM spec fluid (whatever came out of the factory). OEM fluid, maw interval, sort of thing. It’s time for another change and I’m wondering whether to stay with it or go Pentosin or Redline. The real answer is, the way I drive the car it probably doesn’t matter. But I’m generally an open minded chap, so I ask the question.

Cheers,

maw
 
First change? How many miles? I’ve been doing mine every 60k (my version of “lifetime”), but just using the MB OEM spec fluid (whatever came out of the factory). OEM fluid, maw interval, sort of thing. It’s time for another change and I’m wondering whether to stay with it or go Pentosin or Redline. The real answer is, the way I drive the car it probably doesn’t matter. But I’m generally an open minded chap, so I ask the question.
I'm not familiar with the Pentosin, but a 30k interval is plenty safe even if it's a Group III. If you use a known-good Group IV/V fluid like Red Line D4, that is probably fine to 50-60k with normal service. Possibly longer. Normally I'd say just change it more often, but 2001 vintage most likely does not have a converter drain plug, which makes the change / flush procedure a RPITA.

Just be glad you don't have a 722.9 (seven-speed) which does not have a dipstick tube and requires the ATF to be pumped upward through the drain hole in the pan. No, seriously.

:oldman:
 
Crazy question, but after a rebuild, how many miles should I go for a filter/redline change?
The rebuilder should specify the first change interval for warranty, but it's usually around 1k-3k miles. Doesn't hurt to do it early, or do a couple of short-interval changes, before switching to the normal 30k interval.

:mushroom1:
 
If using dino-grade ATF (I've used Castrol TransMax in recent years as a dino fluid, and RedLine for synthetic duty) of Dexron III spec, I recommend shortening slightly the 30K interval, and going 20-25K for the ATF-OCI. Full synthetic can go a longer lifespan than dino.

Also in addition to a spare trans filter or three, it's a good idea to have as part of the parts stock, a couple of new pan gaskets (MB OE or ElringKlinger is fine as far as brands), and a spare drain plug or three for the torque converter and pan. Note that the E500E transmission filter is a special part number from the "normal" 722.3 filter (E500E filter part number 129 277 01 95, through in a pinch a pedestrian 722.3 filter 126 277 02 95 will work).

I've found that past "mechanics" have stripped the hex-based drain plugs to within an inch of their life, and I often replace them out of hand these days. I keep 10-12 in my parts stock for just this situation. All of these parts are bone-cheap and good insurance.

Cheers,
Gerry
 
"Just be glad you don't have a 722.9 (seven-speed) which does not have a dipstick tube and requires the ATF to be pumped upward through the drain hole in the pan. No, seriously."

I do have a newer one with the "Blue Fluid" or maybe it was green... They have a stanchion pipe which sets the level. Pain? Yes it takes a lot longer to service. First, it needs to be cold. Mine had a TC plug, do the pan. Just stuck a pick in to unsnap the tube. The pan bolts are aluminum stretch bolts. They are tightened ... inch ounces plus 180 degrees. Pump fluid in through the drain hole(you've put back the tube), then run it through gears and wait till it hits a specific temp. Then open the drain and let the excess drain out. Made a huge difference in shifting...

My understanding is MB Germany has always had 60,000 km service intervals on the tranmissions. That is ~39,000 miles.
 
I do have a newer one with the "Blue Fluid" or maybe it was green... They have a stanchion pipe which sets the level. Pain? Yes it takes a lot longer to service. First, it needs to be cold. Mine had a TC plug, do the pan. Just stuck a pick in to unsnap the tube. The pan bolts are aluminum stretch bolts. They are tightened ... inch ounces plus 180 degrees. Pump fluid in through the drain hole(you've put back the tube), then run it through gears and wait till it hits a specific temp. Then open the drain and let the excess drain out. Made a huge difference in shifting...
Yep, that is the procedure on the 722.9 (seven-speed) tranny. And yes, they did bring back the converter drain on the 722.9, likely due to never-ending complaints about it being deleted from 1998 through the early/mid 2000's on the 5-speed boxes. But in retaliation, the engineers decided to make the fluid change miserable in a different way. :x



My understanding is MB Germany has always had 60,000 km service intervals on the tranmissions. That is ~39,000 miles.
The 722.3 used in the W124 was 30kmi for normal service, and I think 15k with severe service (this assumed dino ATF).
 

Attachments

  • atf.jpg
    atf.jpg
    29.1 KB · Views: 16
I could only drain about 2.6 liters out of the 722.6 with tranny pan removed, since you can not drain the torque converter.
So, there will be a mix of old and new fluid.
 
Cheers all!

Much great information in this thread, but please, bare with me, since prior to taking on this 1995 SL500 project, the only information I've had to use for transmissions was "How many quarts, what part numbers" and I changed the fluids. Never knew about the time lapse to go into reverse more or less "predicts" the life status of 722.3!

Long story short, this resurrected car - I started to drive every day, just to test any issues that may arise. Fluids are fresh, using Maxlife Valvoline. What I have noticed, that when the car is cold, the shift time to Reverse is about 1 sec, but after driving it for a while, and it has been near 100F outside, it is at 2.5 sec delay to Reverse.

Would switching to say Redline High Temp ATF make a difference, since based on the spec sheet, Vis @ 100°C, is 9.5 and viscosity index of 220with Redline, where Valvoline @ 100°C reads 5.91 with viscosity index of 156.

At operating temperatures, are these numbers of Redline significant enough to try to see if it would make a difference? There is always Type F from what I read on the prior page...?

This transmission was leaking out of B1 and B2 cylinders (fixed both and now bone dry), was not completely empty when I bought the car, but was low indeed and lazy, so I'm sure prior owner has neglected it's service more than I would have liked. Just want to extend the life of this unit.

Regards,
D
 
First - I'm assuming there is no clicking or "whirring" noises when reverse engages, correct? Just a delay?

I'll let Jono chime in, but I suspect in this case if you wanted to experiment, try turning up the modulator a turn or more firmer, and maybe try Type F. However, with a 2.5 second delay, I'm guessing you either have a worn clutch pack, or a worn lip seal... both of which require pulling the tranny, and pulling the front pump. This would be the proper fix IMO, along with removing 4-5 of the 20 springs while it's apart. Cost is minimal for the parts, but it's a bunch of labor to get the trans out and on the workbench.


:seesaw:
 
Yup...F and Modulator pressure. SOMETIMES I get really lucky and the clutches have glazed from slipping and as the car gets used the Lack of friction modifiers in the type F + added pressure Appears to work that glaze off. Either way I've Saved countless transmissions on F and pressure...bought some solid time on Reverse issues but that's less of a guarantee.

....plus nice positive shifts are my bag...baby :jono:

jono
 
Thanks for the feedback, appreciate it!

Nope, no noises or any other odd behaviors, just slower to shift to R when at full operating temperatures compare to when the the car is cold. It is under 1 sec when cold, crisp and perfect, but then... Then she warms up:teufel:

Rebuilding is probably a most appropriate thing, however, for this car, at this stage - not an option for me, I have no access to the lift, soooooo... ATF type F and the modulator pressure it is! Worse thing could happen would be no improvement, worth a try indeed!

Thanks again all, appreciate it!

Regards,
D

EDIT: Any recommendations on the brand for Type F? Cant find any "brand name" locally, will have to order online...
 
Last edited:
I needed a little break from the car maintenance, just wanted to drive something for a little, not fix. Until this morning...

First and foremost - TYPE F!!!!! Changed it this morning, just came back from a lengthy drive, mix highway/city/country roads, very very noticeable difference in firmness in shifts, very noticeable firmness on take off - I never knew it was somewhat sluggish until Type F went in, my other cars are 722.6 and 722.5 units, so I'm newbie to 722.3 transmissions.

Finally, fully warm transmission, shift time into R from D, P or N is 1.5-1.6 seconds! To D is instant, but nearly a full second is shaved off for reverse! I have not touched the modulator, and will not for now, as it feels like a different car now, very happy with the outcome.

No one had any Type F in stock, but PepBoys guaranteed next day avail, ordered online, picked up next day after work, Castrol Transmax what's in the car now.

Thank you all for advice, appreciate it very much gentlemen, Type F for this beast seems perfect!!! :gsxracer:

Regards,
D
 
can someone explain to me ...is there any disadvantages of using this socalled Type F oil?is something at risk breaking?
I am abit lazy..and didnt go through the whole thread here..but i hope maybe someone can give me a little insight?
 
can someone explain to me ...is there any disadvantages of using this socalled Type F oil?is something at risk breaking?
I am abit lazy..and didnt go through the whole thread here..but i hope maybe someone can give me a little insight?
Nope. Nothing. If it was gonna break I'd of broken it.


Jono

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 
Me too. I have a question…I didn't drive my 500E for several months. I noticed reverse has a long delay, excelleration doesn't feel right has a slight hesitation almost unnoticeable and going around corners sometimes slips a little bit. There's a new vibration, not sure if that would be a center disk or motor mounts or lose belt? Does low fluid cause a vibration?

Hey Duh_Vinci ….what do you mean the "time lapse" in reverse "predicts" the life of the tranny? Did I f mine up already?

So…
I checked the fluid and it is light reddish-brownish and very low. The near-by shop charges $500 for a service, which I guess that's okay.

gsxr- I need to know what the part number is for the shift mechanism so I can have the mechanic upgrade that while he has the tranny undone. And, temporarily (before I drop the car off) for the service, can I add a bottle of Lucas ATF conditioner to bring the fluid level up, with or without adding more ATF-F? I'm not sure yet how much fluid it'll need. I will take the car in for service in about 2 weeks. Should I not drive it until the tranny is fixed?
 
Cheers all!

Much great information in this thread, but please, bare with me, since prior to taking on this 1995 SL500 project, the only information I've had to use for transmissions was "How many quarts, what part numbers" and I changed the fluids. Never knew about the time lapse to go into reverse more or less "predicts" the life status of 722.3!

Long story short, this resurrected car - I started to drive every day, just to test any issues that may arise. Fluids are fresh, using Maxlife Valvoline. What I have noticed, that when the car is cold, the shift time to Reverse is about 1 sec, but after driving it for a while, and it has been near 100F outside, it is at 2.5 sec delay to Reverse.

Would switching to say Redline High Temp ATF make a difference, since based on the spec sheet, Vis @ 100°C, is 9.5 and viscosity index of 220with Redline, where Valvoline @ 100°C reads 5.91 with viscosity index of 156.

At operating temperatures, are these numbers of Redline significant enough to try to see if it would make a difference? There is always Type F from what I read on the prior page...?

This transmission was leaking out of B1 and B2 cylinders (fixed both and now bone dry), was not completely empty when I bought the car, but was low indeed and lazy, so I'm sure prior owner has neglected it's service more than I would have liked. Just want to extend the life of this unit.

Regards,
D
Any transmission out of car scenario is a good excuse for a rebuild if anything is dodgy and you plan to depend on the car for reliable primary transportation. Last I checked a full on rebuild was about 1700 and 300 to r and r. Sun Valley is local to me so thats who I use. One less thing to think about. No mucking around with 500 "service" BS. Make sure it shifts good and hard. And then change the fluid and filter evry 20 or 30k. Change the mount, center bearing and flex discs while its on the hoist.

87 300TD om606 compound turbo
94 e420
85 300tdt
 
I don't know anyone that will R&R a transmission for 300$. Not even modern boxes which is a BREEZE relative to pulling a .3 out of an 036.

I can't build my transmissions that cheap, but sunvalley does have that qty factory going for them... but we also make some improvements that I know other shops don't..:)

Jono
 
Me too. I have a question…I didn't drive my 500E for several months. I noticed reverse has a long delay, excelleration doesn't feel right has a slight hesitation almost unnoticeable and going around corners sometimes slips a little bit. There's a new vibration, not sure if that would be a center disk or motor mounts or lose belt? Does low fluid cause a vibration?
Low fluid should not cause a vibration. The issues are probably unrelated. A long delay engaging reverse (how long? 1-2 seconds, or 4-5 seconds?) is not good and may indicate a rebuild is in your future.


I checked the fluid and it is light reddish-brownish and very low.
It should be cherry red. When was the fluid/filter last changed? Factory interval is 30kmi for normal service, 15kmi for severe service. Remember the level must be checked on a level surface, with the engine idling in Park, with the trans FULLY hot. That means 20+ minutes driving at freeway speeds, not 20 minutes puttering around town. In cold winter temps, it might take even longer.


The near-by shop charges $500 for a service, which I guess that's okay.
$500 is steep! It's about 2 hours labor and maybe $75 in fluid / filter / gasket. You could do it yourself, although it isn't fun if you don't have access to a lift. There's a DIY thread on the forum with step-by-step instructions. Make sure the local shop transmission "service" includes DRAINING THE TORQUE CONVERTER. The dealer will do this. If it's an MB specialist shop, they should do this. Anywhere else, they probably won't... if so, don't go there. There's no need for a "flush machine", those are used for vehicles that do not have a converter drain plug. Don't let them convince you the flush is "better" and therefore justifies the $500 cost. It's easier for them (more profit), not better for the transmission.


gsxr- I need to know what the part number is for the shift mechanism so I can have the mechanic upgrade that while he has the tranny undone. And, temporarily (before I drop the car off) for the service, can I add a bottle of Lucas ATF conditioner to bring the fluid level up, with or without adding more ATF-F? I'm not sure yet how much fluid it'll need. I will take the car in for service in about 2 weeks. Should I not drive it until the tranny is fixed?
What part number are you looking for on the shift mechanism? Don't add any conditioning products, Lucas or otherwise... likely a waste of money. Just add more ATF if needed, remember the difference between MIN and MAX on the dipstick is less than half a quart, so add a little at a time once you get near the MIN mark.

Also, don't expect the transmission "service" (meaning, fluid & filter change) to fix everything. But it's worth a try before taking more extreme measures (trans rebuild). If there is slipping at upshifts, that's a separte discussion... slipping on all upshifts could be fixed by adjusting (or replacing) the vacuum modulator, slipping only on certain upshifts means checking the springs for those upshifts in the valvebody and replacing if necessary. Using Type F (Ford) fluid may also help limp along a tired transmission, if you want to delay the $2k+ cost of a rebuild.

Which specific upshifts are flaring / slipping? 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, or all three?


:duck:
 
...Hey Duh_Vinci ….what do you mean the "time lapse" in reverse "predicts" the life of the tranny? Did I f mine up already?...
Basically what gsxr mentioned in his post, these extended delays from the time one shift the lever into Reverse, to the time it takes for Reverse to actually engage. Those longer times are the indicator or the "soon to be a need" for the rebuild...
... A long delay engaging reverse (how long? 1-2 seconds, or 4-5 seconds?) is not good and may indicate a rebuild is in your future...
Regards,
D
 
Well, I ordered Redline High-Temp ATF. I figured at about 600 miles after the tranny rebuild, it would be a good time to fully drain it, replace the filter and load up with Redline as many of you use, 2 gallons and 1 quart bottles are on their way, along with new filter, drain plugs and washers...

Regards,
D
 
@gsxr, does RedLine's D4 specs match 236.10 spec? What about RedLine High Temp ATF? Which would you put into your street car?

@Duh_Vinci, mate, why did you go with High-Temp ATF instead of D4?
 
D4 should work for 236.10 specs, including the 722.6... I've used it for W124 and W210 applications. D4 is what I put in our daily drivers.

High Temp is a thicker version of D4, generally intended for towing or racing, and probably isn't any benefit for street use - but it doesn't hurt anything either.

:seesaw:
 
...High Temp is a thicker version of D4, generally intended for towing or racing, and probably isn't any benefit for street use - but it doesn't hurt anything either.

:seesaw:
@kiev Exactly what @gsxr said. I figured since I'm going to be driving the hell out this car (and I do), every little bit of extra protection - is welcomed.

Regards,
D
 
As another data point ('93 500E), I would offer my own experience in colder weather (freezing and below) with the transmission flaring or slipping a bit when shifting gears prior to the fluid (Redline D4) warming up to normal temperature. Could be that this is unrelated to fluid viscosity (for e.g., my transmission may beginning down the road to replacement or re-build), but I find myself having to be easy on the accelerator until things warm up. I have a 1st gear start valve body installed, but the "flaring" occurs at the 3/4 shift. 1/2 and 2/3 seem unaffected by temperature. I do not notice any 3/4 flare/slip once the fluid is at normal operating temp. Lastly, I began noticing this behavior last summer, even with the higher ambient temperatures, the flare was there, just much less pronounced. YRMV
 
As another data point ('93 500E), I would offer my own experience in colder weather (freezing and below) with the transmission flaring or slipping a bit when shifting gears prior to the fluid (Redline D4) warming up to normal temperature. (snip)
Have you tried turning up the modulator 1/2 to 1 full turn (firmer / clockwise)? That may help.

:rugby:
 
My trans rebuild temp related little flare happens when the fluid is cold for the 3/4 shift, and that is with dino by the indy installer and Redline after 3k of use. If the car is at temp, there is zero flare for me. This is the E420 VB installed.
 
Last edited:
I read this whole thread over the course of the day. Posts by @clarkz71 from 2014-2015 are phaking terrific! (Is he alive?) @jhodg5ck and type F ATF? - mind bending.

@Duh_Vinci, you tried type F, but then I see you switching to RL High Temp. Did you not liketype F at the end?

@gsxr, have you managed the courage to try 236.14 in any of your 722.3 vehicles? There's no way your curiosity did not outweigh all the concerns!

If you use a known-good Group IV/V fluid like Red Line D4
I looked carefully at D4 and, unlike with their engine oils, nowhere does RL mention group IV/V as the formula. With viscosity index of 188, I see some other brands out there with higher VI that are definitely not group IV/V, such as, for example, MAG1. Is D4 group IV/V?
 
I read this whole thread over the course of the day. Posts by @clarkz71 from 2014-2015 are phaking terrific! (Is he alive?) @jhodg5ck and type F ATF? - mind bending.

@Duh_Vinci, you tried type F, but then I see you switching to RL High Temp. Did you not liketype F at the end?
Oh, I liked it fine, and it did help my dying transmission for some time:

It even fixes UN-healthy transmissions too...done it countless times:)

Really can't even count how many .3's/4's and 5's are running around on F from my shop.
And I would gladly use it again without any reservations if a "need to save a sluggish/dying tranny" would arise, but since I've rebuild my 722.3, Redline High Temp been working well for me, as it has for many others...

Regards,
D
 
@jhodg5ck and type F ATF? - mind bending.
Jono's experience prompted me to try it as well. However, none of my transmissions are tired enough to have noticeable slippage. I saw zero difference in shift firmness/feel with Type F in my high-mile E420 (240kmi, original trans). I also switched to Red Line Racing (High Temp Type F) for the 600E and again, no difference. Go figure.


@gsxr, have you managed the courage to try 236.14 in any of your 722.3 vehicles? There's no way your curiosity did not outweigh all the concerns!
Nope, not yet. But I've gone soft over the years and would be less opposed to the idea. I still believe it's likely that switching from original thicker fluid (up to 236.10, Dex-II, Dex-III) to any thinner fluid (236.12, 236.14, Dex-VI) will need to have the vacuum modulator adjusted firmer.



I looked carefully at D4 and, unlike with their engine oils, nowhere does RL mention group IV/V as the formula. With viscosity index of 188, I see some other brands out there with higher VI that are definitely not group IV/V, such as, for example, MAG1. Is D4 group IV/V?
I have NO idea what the base stock is for any Red Line ATF. But I am curious. Also, they appear to have changed some of their formulas in the past 10 years. The High Temp received a massive increase in VI while the others did not. Hmmm:

VI, 2010VI, 2021
D4198188
D6166163
High Temp172220
Racing177177


1624975453235.png
 
I have NO idea what the base stock is for any Red Line ATF. But I am curious.
Their dual clutch transmission fluid is stated as PAO+esters and it's the most expensive: $20/quart. CVT is stated as PAO only and is $14/quart. No mention of PAO or esters for other ATFs. It could be that D4 at $12.50/quart is group III only? 🙁

Screenshot_20210629-124048~2.png
 
Their dual clutch transmission fluid is stated as PAO+esters and it's the most expensive: $20/quart. CVT is stated as PAO only and is $14/quart. No mention of PAO or esters for other ATFs. It could be that D4 at $12.50/quart is group III only? 🙁
I sure hope not! But we'd need to have Red Line tech support confirm...

😟
 
I sure hope not! But we'd need to have Red Line tech support confirm...

😟
I found info/tests for D6 on oilclub.ru. (D6 is a thinner D4?) Red Line also claims it "meets" 236.12 spec, so technically, we can use it in 722.3... Anyways, Russians definitively claim based on a performed fourier-transform spectrometry it's PAO base + esters. Therefore, D4 should be as well

Just in case you are very curious, you can make Google translate this page:
 
Interesting! And yes, D6 is the newer/thinner version, i.e. Dexron-VI, MB 236.12/236.14 spec. It's fine for 722.3 but may require adjusting the vacuum modulator if the trans has been using thicker fluid previously.

D4 is the older/thicker version, i.e. Dexron-III, up through MB 236.10 spec (initial spec for the 722.6 NAG1 electronic trans used on the W210/W140/R129 as of 1995/96).

Chart below from the Red Line catalog at this link:

1625079275182.png
 
Yep, that is the procedure on the 722.9 (seven-speed) tranny. And yes, they did bring back the converter drain on the 722.9, likely due to never-ending complaints about it being deleted from 1998 through the early/mid 2000's on the 5-speed boxes. But in retaliation, the engineers decided to make the fluid change miserable in a different way. :x
I will have to service my father's 722.9 soon, can your recommend a PDF or some online step by step tutorial for these units (2008 E350)?
 
Somehow it seems fitting that my 30,000th (!!!) post on the forum is in an oil thread. OK, ok, transmission oil, but close enough.

Anyway - the 722.9 process should be straightforward since it should have a converter drain plug. The WIS procedure is at this link.

The few things to note are:

1) You need a fluid pump to refill. I bought the Extoil unit here and have been happy with it for the couple of times I've used it.​
2) The WIS document implies you pump the entire amount of fluid back in before starting the engine, which sounded like a recipe for disaster. Klink confirmed that this isn't a good idea, pump 5-6 quarts in, start the engine (same as a 722.3), cycle through gear positions, then pump in the rest. Spec varies with different 722.9 versions so check what is needed your specific year/model.​
3) The fill process (PDF here) requires monitoring fluid temp, preferably with SDS live data, or with IR thermometer if necessary. Additional info is in this document, print pages 34/35 (PDF page 35/36).​

As described in the docs above, you will need to purposely overfill by ~0.5L. It will help if you collect the drained fluid and measure it, then refill with that amount plus 0.5 L or QT. I weigh the drain receptacle empty, then weigh again full, to calculate the fluid volume based on weight.


1625755838789.png

:yayo: :choochoo:
 
Somehow it seems fitting that my 30,000th (!!!) post on the forum is in an oil thread. OK, ok, transmission oil, but close enough.

Anyway - the 722.9 process should be straightforward since it should have a converter drain plug. The WIS procedure is at this link.

The few things to note are:

1) You need a fluid pump to refill. I bought the Extoil unit here and have been happy with it for the couple of times I've used it.​
2) The WIS document implies you pump the entire amount of fluid back in before starting the engine, which sounded like a recipe for disaster. Klink confirmed that this isn't a good idea, pump 5-6 quarts in, start the engine (same as a 722.3), cycle through gear positions, then pump in the rest. Spec varies with different 722.9 versions so check what is needed your specific year/model.​
3) The fill process (PDF here) requires monitoring fluid temp, preferably with SDS live data, or with IR thermometer if necessary. Additional info is in this document, print pages 34/35 (PDF page 35/36).​

As described in the docs above, you will need to purposely overfill by ~0.5L. It will help if you collect the drained fluid and measure it, then refill with that amount plus 0.5 L or QT. I weigh the drain receptacle empty, then weigh again full, to calculate the fluid volume based on weight.


View attachment 134383

:yayo: :choochoo:
Thanks for the info Dave, much appreciated! Now off to watch a short video, and I will certainly feel like some kinda "certified" to do the job well! Definitely makes sense on this fluid pump, and new bolts are needed too! Will do soon!
Sorry for interference with 722.9, back to original topic, 722.3!!! :peep:

Regards,
D
 
I opted for the 236.10 Synthetic ATF instead of the 236.14. There is one manufacturer that claims a 236.14 that is backward compatible with the 722.3 , but the viscosity index for this ATF is significantly less that 236.10 at 40c (around 25% less). I would consider it for a "normal car" but with around 680NM its best to have a heavier blend.
 
A word on my 722.5 box that was rebuilt in 2017 and worked well ever since, touch wood. They filled it with an "original" spec D2 fluid.

After a while, we tweaked the modulator to slightly "sharpen" the shifts. Satisfied with that.

In 2022, after about 50K Kms we drained box and torque converter and fitted new MB filter and seal.

We used TITAN ATF 5005, Dexron III (H), MB Appro: 236.6. Very satisfied.

Shifts seem to be, if anything, better than before, more positive, if that makes sense. I did have a 4th/5th "hunting" on high speed shifts and that now seems almost solved.

So, have I chosen well the Fuchs fluid?

In any event, I'm really not too stressed.

Best to all.

RayH
 

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 8) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 5) View details

Back
Top