Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jono measured a set for me years ago... assuming the numbers were accurate, the .960 had the lowest lift of any M119, even lower than the 93-up. We're only talking about a few tenths of a millimeter though.Das anybody know what valve lift was on early m119 (199.960) engine? I find that after 1993 lift was redused.

You cannot determine lift from duration. The only way is to measure the lobes. Also, lift and duration are two separate items... you can have high lift with short duration, or vice-versa.
![]()
119.960 cams are different, but they DO NOT have more lift. And, MB used the same camshafts for M119 engines both with and without catalysts.My theory why 119.960 must have more lift is that we need conpensate air loses when Mercedes add cat, more here
http://www.benzworld.org/forums/r129-sl-class/2027681-119-960-no-cat-no-oxygen.html


gsxr, I figure out your poin of view, but doc say different story. I see only one way to solve this problem, is or find spec or do measure of lobes.
I also not a first time on drive seat.
One person may make error or engine already was modified before, many reason way one person may have wrong result. I see when in offical doc have number error, but all setences is too many.

This is incorrect. The FSM for the 119.960 AMG 6.0L engine specified "Intake and exhaust camshafts have a modified cam profile." The EPC does not always show all the parts used on early AMG engines:and now lets look at my engine http://www.neoriginal.ru/cat/mb/part__1_1_15M_119_960_515_129_066/05
this give you only one number 1190508401 and car 129.066 was also as AMG 6L with CIS-E system
what that mean is that on engine 119.960 in 5L and 6L was the same camshaft.
This document is describing the differences between the 1992 .97x engines, and the 1993-up .97x engines. It is not relevant to the .960 engine at all (or, the later .98x engines, which received different changes).And all this is ok with M119_1993_updates.pdf even more it describe engines from 119.960 and later and dont describe engine 119.97x from 1992.
You can believe that all you want, but it still won't be true.All in all you wrong in 2 ways:
1. There was no difference in camshaft in 119.97x from 1992 and later.
2. Lobes on 119.960 must be longer than on 119.97x

There is not just one camshaft for the 119.974... I am not sure why you think that. This is well documented. IIRC, even the EPC shows different part numbers with an engine serial number break which corresponds with the changes between 1992 / 1993.Open file M119_1993_updates.pdf and read fist page carefully and you lose moment that EPC have info about E60, and have just one camshaft for all 119.974 engine for ALL years. This is inportant.

That is not the factory EPC. That is the Russian copy. It is incomplete and inaccurate. Get the full EPC.http://www.neoriginal.ru/cat/mb/part__1_1_15M_119_974_44S_124_036/05
Give gust 2 numbers. one of for E60 another for all other.
I already answered that question, but you didn't like what you heard. My advice would be obtain a set of .960 camshafts and measure them yourself.Anyway it is no anwser for my first qestion about lift for 119.960

Forgot to mention: The 119.960 engine was only produced from 1990-1992 (USA model years). The 1993-up changes cannot apply to the .960 because it was already out of production.Das anybody know what valve lift was on early m119 (199.960) engine? I find that after 1993 lift was redused.

Yep. I own both 1992 engines and 1993-up (119.974) and the cams are absolutely, without question, different. Including different code numbers to identify them.I also measured two sets of M119.97x camshafts next to each other. One set from a 92 and one set from a 95. I do not have the figures in front of me, but there was a distinct difference in lift.
