• Hi Guest !

    Welcome to the 500Eboard forum.

    Since its founding in late 2008, 500Eboard has become the leading resource on the Internet for all things related to the Mercedes-Benz 500E and E500. In recent years, we have also expanded to include the 400E and E420 models, which are directly related to the 500E/E500.

    We invite you to browse and take advantage of the information and resources here on the site. If you find helpful information, please register for full membership, and you'll find even more resources available. Feel free to ask questions, and make liberal use of the "Search" function to find answers.

    We hope you will become an active contributor to the community!

    Sincerely,
    500Eboard Management

Camshaft Regrind Thread

Christian_K

I do believe...!
Member
Hi everybody, let us discuss specifically about camshaft regrind here for performance reasons.

Reference Topics:
http://www.500eboard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1000
http://www.500eboard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1787&page=2
http://www.500eboard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7839

I'm planning to get my Cams regrind in the next weeks to the Hagmann Profile by Dbilas. Question is still, do i need shims under the hydraulic lifters or not.
Someone here in this forums said yes, others say no, and again others say its not even possible (See here).

Why do i need new lifters for a cam regrind? I Have one Set that is only 46km old, later style (lighter) IIRC INNA. I use the old style double valve springs.
 
Last edited:
I dont know it yet. Valve Lift will go from 9.5mm stock to 10.4mm. Dunno if they reduce it by 0.9mm or its it half of that value?

Here is a nice pictured information from outside. I think that a non-hydraulic tappet though:
http://www.gencoupe.com/3-8-v6-discussion-2008-2012/104459-i-found-3-8-cams-6.html#post1252100

Just spoke with the hotline of Dbilas because the advice not to do a regrind appeared here: http://www.500eboard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8053&p=102107&viewfull=1#post102107
They told me that in most cases the hardening surface is so thick that a re-hardening is not neccessary and the camshaft will last. If thickness is not thick enough after regrind, they offer hardening after regrinding, which is another 50€ per camshaft on top.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jim
Just spoke with the hotline of Dbilas because the advice not to do a regrind appeared here: http://www.500eboard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8053&p=102107&viewfull=1#post102107
They told me that in most cases the hardening surface is so thick that a re-hardening is not neccessary and the camshaft will last. If thickness is not thick enough after regrind, they offer hardening after regrinding, which is another 50€ per camshaft on top.

Confimr to this also, mechanic who re-grind my cam shaft told that OEM cams are very high quality and hardenin is very thick and should not be a problem.
 
Confimr to this also, mechanic who re-grind my cam shaft told that OEM cams are very high quality and hardenin is very thick and should not be a problem.

Yes, i had some questions again to the DBilas Technology guy and he knows a bit about the M119 engines. He told me that the M119 cams are made of "Schalenhartguss" a certain ultra-hard surface finish and that during the casting process, hardening happens up to the core. Never an issue with M119 cams that got reground.

Jouniu, can you tell more about your reground cams? Power increase? Spacer-caps/Shims under the Lifters? Any noise increase or just tell us about every difference please to the stock cams. Thank you.
 
Yes, i had some questions again to the DBilas Technology guy and he knows a bit about the M119 engines. He told me that the M119 cams are made of "Schalenhartguss" a certain ultra-hard surface finish and that during the casting process, hardening happens up to the core. Never an issue with M119 cams that got reground.

Jouniu, can you tell more about your reground cams? Power increase? Spacer-caps/Shims under the Lifters? Any noise increase or just tell us about every difference please to the stock cams. Thank you.

Engine project still on hold, too much other work. But anyway it seem that 1mm lash-caps are needed, and always new hydraulic lifters, 32x, $$$ :)
 
I did it... went full ported+portmatched heads, increased compression (resurfaced heads with -0.3mm height) and Dbilas Regrinds. He removed 1mm from each base circle so Valvelift increase is significant on the intake side.
See My setup here: http://www.dbilas-shop.com/Produkte...19-Seriennockenwellen-umschleifen::10537.html

More is not possible with stock hydraulic lifters, since the Lifters are maxed out with a removal of 1mm base circle.
The performance increase is significant on the butt dyno. Now the 500E went from "boring" to "interesting" (Yes i am spoiled, having a 55Kompressor as a daily driver).
Especially on the Autobahn and above 3500RPM this car is a whole other animal compared to before. Really, it want to break tires loose going kick-down around 100kph. Car never done that before.
Changes in speeds between 120kph and 200kph on the Autobahn happen now almost in "no time" and i have a grin on my face now everytime i drive the old lady on the Bahn.

I have no tune yet. And also not yet installed some monitoring AFR gauges... However i think it runs to lean on the fixed WOT fuel-map up top. I noticed that when having the foot just a felt millimeter before the WOT point (according to SDS live-data), that it accelerates better. Bernard also strongly suggested a tune with these changes. In the best case the WOT-Enriched ECU i drive will now be around AFR 14.7:1 during WOT, just like the non-wot enriched ECUs, which is no problem for the M119 engine. However it could be even leaner and that would be bad, so i have not yet tested V-Max with the car. Will wait for AFR monitoring tools in next season.
 
I did it... went full ported+portmatched heads, increased compression (resurfaced heads with -0.3mm height) and Dbilas Regrinds. He removed 1mm from each base circle so Valvelift increase is significant on the intake side.
Nice! Did you have to use custom valve springs, or machine the spring seat in the heads, or use "buttons" for the lifters? Was it a straight drop-in upgrade? Oh, and do you have the stock double springs, or the stock single springs?



I have no tune yet.... Bernard also strongly suggested a tune with these changes.
And who exactly can do a custom "tune" for the LH chip, besides maybe Bernard?


:apl: :apl:
 
Christian -

Do you feel like you have lost any torque down low or gained engine vibration? The LH should adjust a little bit over time, but it sounds like there was a significant change...did you reset the adaptation?
 
Hi everybody,
i used the stock early series double valve springs. They can compress with 10.4mm Lift and still have some air between the windings. Later style ones have to be replaced with custom ones or the early style ones. :-)
I measured everything toroughly and simulated it before pulling the trigger on the reground cams. Its important though that the valve guides upper end dont stick out further than 10mm (Stock according to FSM) into the spring/tappet bore, otherwise the upper spring cup will kill the valveshaft seals by touching them.
So i measured 10.4-10.5mm to be the maximum possible in Lift with the stock heads.
I thought about 11mm cams with shims in the first place, but for that you have to do either what AMG did with the Spring/Tappet Bore in the heads or you shorten the valve guides by a few millimeters and push them down further into the intake ports. Also other springs of course and you have to measure piston to valve clearance and a de+re assembly of heads while the engines is in the car is not nice.

I needed no shims under the lifters, i bought first a set of new (Federal Mogul) AE FOL 147 Lifters (they are of the later style lighter ones with shorter skirts by -2mm like the INA) but they made terrible noises, so i threw them away, took again 4 days of labor and disassembled everything again and inserted a new set of 32 INA tappets "INA 420004200". Now everything is smooth and silent. The Lifters are pumped-up to their maximum and the base circles barely touching them. I think on some cam-lobes there is a hard to measure Gap of maybe less than 0.05mm between base circle and tappet. So its really the maximum without shims.
Ohh AND:
Because i inserted self-made conical-shaped valve guides, i had to re-cut the valve-seats in the heads and the valve-seats on the valves itself and this leads to, that the valves now sit approx 0.2-0.3mm higher into the heads. So i think without doing this, maybe the base-circles of the cams would have a gap of those 0.2-0.3mm between them and the tappet surface.
I hope you understand what i mean?
BTW: Valve-Guides on the exhaust side were totally worn out. Engine has approx 220.000km. Bernard says they wear out already after like 150.000KM. He replaces them on every engine he has to tear apart if the customer gives their "OK".

Idle is the same as before, no bad effects so far. However my engine always had a shaky idle until driven for a few miles, it still has it compared to other 500Es. Dunno what that is, maybe the injectors?

EDIT: Ohh and i think it gained torque down low. Guys that know me in personal like Gerry and Jelmer might remeber my slight rants about the 500E beeing boring and sluggish down low especially because of the lame 2nd gear start. Now when i push more than half-throttle from standstill, it also "throws" my head into the headrest. I did not so before... I mean the whole throttle response got way more "direct" and "agressive"...its more "instant"... hard to describe for me in english. But best is still the gain above 3500RPM... Whole other engine. Really... More sporty or so... cant decribe it in english im sorry.
 
Last edited:
Awesome and your english discription of the performance change is quite good. I had similar concerns with cams between different lifts. DaveM has a 11mm cammed 6.0 liter Renntech and has been able to compare to their 10.5mm cam motor. I thought like quicksilver500, that there would be loss for the high-end gain. But it talking with him, it just seemed to be the lighter pocketbook- due to the extra costs.
I would point out, that with the lifters nearly maxed- they cannot over pump at high rpm. You effectively can run higher rpm as they are performing like solid lifters.

If you get playing and using a dyno to adjust the WOT fuel curve. I would think you can also change the off-set resistor on the EZL, perhaps you can run a little more timing too. Your sds will let you know in the run if the Knock sensors trigger.

It will be interesting for you to see the dyno curve and quantify the hp/torque changes. Great to hear it livens up the 5.0 liter. If you went from 325 to 360-375 hp, that would be a nice increase.

FYI I want a set of 11 mm cams.

Michael
 
However i think it runs to lean on the fixed WOT fuel-map up top. ...Enriched ECU i drive will now be around AFR 14.7:1 during WOT...which is no problem for the M119 engine. However it could be even leaner and that would be bad, so i have not yet tested V-Max with the car.

Good work Christian...I have always suspected the OEM fuel injectors were on the small side.

And also not yet installed some monitoring AFR gauges...Will wait for AFR monitoring tools in next season.

I went with Tech Edge WBO2; have you chosen yet?

Jim
 
I've run innovate's wbo2 with good results over the years..:)

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Sounds awesome! The cost is €747 including VAT, plus shipping, correct? Do they have any cores available or do you have to send over a set? It would cost around $150-$200 USD to ship over a set of core camshafts. I wonder what the cost is for the special springs (to replace the single conical springs on 1993-1995 engines). I'd still like to try a set of these cams.

Any chance you can get it on a dyno?

:deniro:
 
As to my knowledge they require your set of cams to do it. Had to send them my cams for the m117 from Kuwait in order to get them done...
 
I was looking hard at WBO2 sensors.

Get one which you can put in place of the stock and it has "narrow band output". Or just add a bung.


He's increased volumetric efficency. Please please please- if you want to really help the group. Whom ever re-programs your chip. Get the Hexidecimal code before and after. I'm assuming you are doing only WOT? I've got problems but in the USA- nobody can re-program my chip.


Michael
 
I'm also curious which cams have to be sent in. The early cams have more lift.

Early .974 cams (1992, with double valve springs): 9.50mm intake lift, 8.75mm exhaust lift, 37.10mm base circle

Late .974 cams (1993-up, with single valve springs): 8.90mm intake lift, 8.40mm exhaust lift, 37.10mm base circle

Can Dblias regrind either type to their specs? Their website doesn't say anything about this.


:scratchchin:
 
He's increased volumetric efficency. Please please please- if you want to really help the group. Whom ever re-programs your chip. Get the Hexidecimal code before and after. I'm assuming you are doing only WOT? I've got problems but in the USA- nobody can re-program my chip.

Michael, if Christian is seeing noticeable power gains even with the stock chip, that is great news. Reprogramming the chip might add a bit more power but if the majority of the gain is available even without reprogramming, I could live with that. If he can provide the custom EPROM binary file for max power, that would be fantastic.

:apl:
 
I'm also curious which cams have to be sent in. The early cams have more lift.

Early .974 cams (1992, with double valve springs): 9.50mm intake lift, 8.75mm exhaust lift, 37.10mm base circle

Late .974 cams (1993-up, with single valve springs): 8.90mm intake lift, 8.40mm exhaust lift, 37.10mm base circle

Can Dblias regrind either type to their specs? Their website doesn't say anything about this.


:scratchchin:

Curious...have you tried the early cams in a late engine?
 
Dave,

Yea it's great he's seeing a difference, but if you remember Hegman showed with just cams or with cams and chip. Seemed like it was ~25 hp without the chip and another 50% with the chip. From what I can gleam into the bosch Hexidecimal programing, the curve is scaled based on averaging. It cannot change the shape of the fueling map. So unless he puts down 100+ miles in a range where it is running lean, there will be more power to be had.

Think of it as you are running 2% lean, so the computer adjusts the fuel curve by 1.02*value. Acceleration time is a small percentage for most of our miles, so it going to be @ 70 mph or what ever.

Michael
 
Curious...have you tried the early cams in a late engine?
No. The difference in lift is small enough that I think it will work ok (no spring bind issues), but I also suspect the stock profiles are so mild, there would be very little gain - if any. Dbilas is adding a fair amount of lift and also increasing duration, AFAICT.

A few years ago, I picked up a spare set of cams to send off for regrinding, but I forget if they are early or late. It's been frustrating that there is so little information available about this modification, i.e. which springs can be used, are 'buttons' required for the lifters, if custom springs are needed what is the cost/availability, etc. Most of my engines are the late style with single conical springs, not the same was Christians. I want to swap camshafts only, not pull cylinder heads, recut valve seats, and dink with stem height issues.

:oldman:
 
My spare M119.960 engine intake cam lift was indeed 9.5mm, I measured it. Re-grind result is intake cam 258/10.4mm and exhaust 252/9.4mm. And yes I need 1mm lash caps, to be safe with hydraulic lifters.
Sidenote: Early M119.960 have 8mm intake valve stem and 9mm exhaust side, My spare engine is from -92 car and that have 7mm valve stems. Just a guess, -92 M119.960 share same cams with 500e m119.97x.
 
Good work Christian...I have always suspected the OEM fuel injectors were on the small side.



I went with Tech Edge WBO2; have you chosen yet?

Jim
No, its different. I run a WOT-Enrichment enabled ECU, that goes into openloop at a certain load. This open-loop has a own fuel map, that need to be adjusted as the car sees
a) more air because of porting/portmatching and increased cam lift+duration and
b) better gas-exchange because of much biggger exhaust ports, less restriction on the exhaust side, 100cell metal cats

I read that Dave once said the self-adaption values would have an influence on the WOT/open-loop map(s) for the early-style wot-enrichment enabled ECUs. Bernard says no, it has to be adjusted on the Dyno.

Sounds awesome! The cost is €747 including VAT, plus shipping, correct? Do they have any cores available or do you have to send over a set? It would cost around $150-$200 USD to ship over a set of core camshafts. I wonder what the cost is for the special springs (to replace the single conical springs on 1993-1995 engines). I'd still like to try a set of these cams.

Any chance you can get it on a dyno?

:deniro:
Dyno maybe next year. I only have 3 days left of registration for this year, currently refinishing front swaybar today so i dont want to drive until its in again. Also next Dyno is at Dbilas from my Location and i would need an appointment for that.
Yes 747€ incl. VAT, for Outside of Europe people i believe final price is MINUS the VAT of 19%. There are NO cam blanks available on the world market anywhere since almost a decade for the M119. Hagmann and Bernard confirmend me this. The Original Blanks were made by MAHLE, they can do new ones but i believe its at least 500 pieces/cam-type so 2000 cam blanks LOL! So you have to send-in your old cams or buy new ones as one M119 cam is reduced this year to IIRC 120€/cam NEW from the dealer.
Other Valve-Springs were like approx 350€ in 2010, so maybe 450€ this year? You have to ask them. Or get used M119.970/972/974 early series heads from the scrap yard/ebay? And use the early style springs?

As to my knowledge they require your set of cams to do it. Had to send them my cams for the m117 from Kuwait in order to get them done...
Yes right, as neither for the M117 nor for the M119 blanks are available unfortuanately. If they were, it were not called "regrinds" but entirely new grind cams
I was looking hard at WBO2 sensors.

Get one which you can put in place of the stock and it has "narrow band output". Or just add a bung.


He's increased volumetric efficency. Please please please- if you want to really help the group. Whom ever re-programs your chip. Get the Hexidecimal code before and after. I'm assuming you are doing only WOT? I've got problems but in the USA- nobody can re-program my chip.


Michael
Yes i had a topic about AFR monitoring here from 2,3 months ago. I think i will go with AEM wideband failsafe.
I have no code reader nor a software for that. We will see what next year brings.

I'm also curious which cams have to be sent in. The early cams have more lift.

Early .974 cams (1992, with double valve springs): 9.50mm intake lift, 8.75mm exhaust lift, 37.10mm base circle

Late .974 cams (1993-up, with single valve springs): 8.90mm intake lift, 8.40mm exhaust lift, 37.10mm base circle

Can Dblias regrind either type to their specs? Their website doesn't say anything about this.


:scratchchin:
They can do both, but for the later ones you need shims under the lifters, as for my Profile they need to remove more than 1mm of the base circle. Shims which i think is another 10bucks/piece!

Michael, if Christian is seeing noticeable power gains even with the stock chip, that is great news. Reprogramming the chip might add a bit more power but if the majority of the gain is available even without reprogramming, I could live with that. If he can provide the custom EPROM binary file for max power, that would be fantastic.

:apl:
We can do some kind of "group buy", I make a dyno tune for my setup (cam regrind, ported/portmatched heads) and you fund me with it and i will send the file/eeprom later on. ;-)

Dave,

Yea it's great he's seeing a difference, but if you remember Hegman showed with just cams or with cams and chip. Seemed like it was ~25 hp without the chip and another 50% with the chip. From what I can gleam into the bosch Hexidecimal programing, the curve is scaled based on averaging. It cannot change the shape of the fueling map. So unless he puts down 100+ miles in a range where it is running lean, there will be more power to be had.

Think of it as you are running 2% lean, so the computer adjusts the fuel curve by 1.02*value. Acceleration time is a small percentage for most of our miles, so it going to be @ 70 mph or what ever.

Michael
Hagmann claimed with this Profile but with more exhaust lift/less duration (10.4mm, compared to 9.85mm of my exhaust profile, but "only" 252° exhaust, while i have 260° exhaust) 30HP/NM, but wirhout tune only 15HP/NM is measurable. With Ported/Portmatched heads they said to me dyno verified 370HP (DIN). Thats ~50HP/Torque plus.

I was driving with these cams and the bad lifters to the this years 500E meet and i put the plug to "NR7" (maximum enrichment everywhere) and my self-adaption values after ~400km showed me like "0.98**" for upper and lower part-load and "-0.2KG/H" for idle.
I now reset it again and put it back to Nr1 and noticed with the new lifters that i goes better. So i drive Monday another 100km and then i will check self-adaption values again.

No. The difference in lift is small enough that I think it will work ok (no spring bind issues), but I also suspect the stock profiles are so mild, there would be very little gain - if any. Dbilas is adding a fair amount of lift and also increasing duration, AFAICT.

A few years ago, I picked up a spare set of cams to send off for regrinding, but I forget if they are early or late. It's been frustrating that there is so little information available about this modification, i.e. which springs can be used, are 'buttons' required for the lifters, if custom springs are needed what is the cost/availability, etc. Most of my engines are the late style with single conical springs, not the same was Christians. I want to swap camshafts only, not pull cylinder heads, recut valve seats, and dink with stem height issues.

:oldman:
Buttons for the lifters? You mean the shims to put under it? Not needed if not more than 1mm is removed from the base circle.
 
Last edited:
Just a guess, -92 M119.960 share same cams with 500e m119.97x.
No, the .960 camshafts are different than the .97x cams. Different part numbers, different castings. Not sure about lift/duration, Jono measure different lift on the .960 cams but his numbers don't match yours. I've never had a set of .960 cams to measure.

:detective:
 
I read that Dave once said the self-adaption values would have an influence on the WOT/open-loop map(s) for the early-style wot-enrichment enabled ECUs. Bernard says no, it has to be adjusted on the Dyno.
On the WOT modules, the adaptation does affect the WOT fuel curve. I did dyno runs with the normal adaptation (say, 1.03) and then reset adaptation to 1.000 and did another dyno pull... same day, same dyno, 20 minutes apart. There was not a significant change in power, HOWEVER, the AFR changed... it was leaner across the entire RPM range with the 1.000 adaptation. Again, there was not a big change in power produced but the adaptation values absolutely do affect WOT fuel enrichment.


Buttons for the lifters? You mean the shims to put under it? Not needed if not more than 1mm is removed from the base circle.
Yes, buttons = shims. I still need them for the 1993-1995 "small" cams though, right? :(

:v8:
 
Curious...have you tried the early cams in a late engine?
Hey! Sauceman did this... right? His motor is a 1993 119.970 with single conical springs, and IIRC he was going to install 1992 cams with his head gasket job. We need a report from him!!

:woot:
 
Just chatted with Brandon/Feind...we're going to forge ahead with some custom cams from Blanks...:)
Figure we'll start with the track rat...I need to get some baseline #'s to start...:-P

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Just chatted with Brandon/Feind...we're going to forge ahead with some custom cams from Blanks...:)
Figure we'll start with the track rat...I need to get some baseline #'s to start...:-P

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Where you get the blanks?
 
Doubt the material will be the same...the 117's were cold forged IIRC but I know the billet price has come down significantly!

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Since you had them measure/scan the piston. Can you tell me what the factory Gudeson pin offset is on the piston of a 117 and 119?



M
 
Just chatted with Brandon/Feind...we're going to forge ahead with some custom cams from Blanks...:)
Figure we'll start with the track rat...I need to get some baseline #'s to start...
Jono, that would be awesome. I'd be interested in something that can bolt in without having to pull the head for additional mods. Maybe offer a "stage 2" setup if there's serious interest in a kit that needs machine work done! Are you planning something along the lines of the Hagmann/Dbilas profile, but with normal base circle so no need for lifter buttons/shims?

:apl:



Any Knowledge of what lift solid cam renntech's were?
I have zero information, just that they exist, and were VERY rare. Not even sure if any were used outside of Hartmut's personal race engines.

:scratchchin:
 
Yes, that would be the idea...a drop in stage 1 and something more silly stage 2.

Now this thread has enlightened me to that possibility that these later cams have less free spring length @ FVO..which may be a Limiting factor... I will need to measure both in the machine/see what we have to play with...

FWIW, free spring @ FVO was a limiting factor in my 117 cam experiments..


I think the blue 6 speed (5 speed?) Manila car was a solid lifter... I'm sure it's just MORE..

Has anyone profiled the AMG E/SL 60 cams or do I need to dig em out and get them run...??

Jono


Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Doubt the material will be the same...the 117's were cold forged IIRC but I know the billet price has come down significantly!

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
So you talking about Steel cams there? Well thats no rocket science and nothing "special" IMHO. I could get Steel Cams M119 from Dbilas at any time. But you would not want to use them in the stock Aluminum bearings in the head. Also they weight about 30% MORE than chilled cast iron which is ridiculous. You could bore large holes into them, but that would change all the oil-pressures of the engine and for the cam bearing places. So i was there already... Only alternative would be "built steel cams" but they will be veeery pricey, i was in contact with some of the manufacturers and we talk about 3000-4000€/Set depending on how many sets getting ordered.
Really good would be the chilled cast iron blanks, like used stock. But like i said: Not Available Anymore. Most tuner would lick their fingers for chilled cast iron M119 cam blanks. There was a reason they NEVER used Steel cams. Some of them tried it and i wont last as good like the stock cams, and we have the Autobahn here... whole different level of "load" for these engines.

Yes, that would be the idea...a drop in stage 1 and something more silly stage 2.

Now this thread has enlightened me to that possibility that these later cams have less free spring length @ FVO..which may be a Limiting factor... I will need to measure both in the machine/see what we have to play with...

FWIW, free spring @ FVO was a limiting factor in my 117 cam experiments..


I think the blue 6 speed (5 speed?) Manila car was a solid lifter... I'm sure it's just MORE..

Has anyone profiled the AMG E/SL 60 cams or do I need to dig em out and get them run...??

Jono


Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
AMG 6L Cams for the LH engines have 10.4mm intake and 10.2mm exhaust lift. Duration is similar to Hagmann, but a bit "less" IIRC. Need to check with Bernard for complete specs.
Hagmann Cams are 10.4mm Intake and 10.4mm exhaust, Duration is 264° intake and 252° exhaust.

Yes the later style valve springs cant compress to full 10.4mm lift. And even worse is that they are softer, and thats a no-no for more lift and more agressive profiles. Valve-spring required forces can be calculated.
 
I doubt y'all are loading any harder then I am on track for 7-8 hour stints...and if all goes well we'll do a 24 hour endurance run next year.

With the repository of coatings available now I'm sure it could be made to Work, just as people as making other pistons work in alusil cylinders and Not using the factory ferrous plating on the skirt.

Billet has come down in price Significantly... So much so its becoming viable $ wise.

I've played my fair share with valve springs, I know how the gig works....its not my first rodeo when it comes to playing the Camshaft game in MB's!:-P

Even the cost of custom springs isn't too nutty anymore...wooo!

Jono


Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Yes, that would be the idea...a drop in stage 1 and something more silly stage 2. Now this thread has enlightened me to that possibility that these later cams have less free spring length @ FVO..which may be a Limiting factor... I will need to measure both in the machine/see what we have to play with... FWIW, free spring @ FVO was a limiting factor in my 117 cam experiments..
Any chance we'd get power from a more aggressive profile, without major increase in lift? The 4-valve heads flow pretty damn good even at "low" lift. But yeah, you'd need to find out the limits with the late heads. On a side note, the same "late" .974 cams are used on the .980 through end of production in 1999... soooo, developing a cam for the late heads would have a larger market available (1996-1999 S500 / SL500).


I think the blue 6 speed (5 speed?) Manila car was a solid lifter... I'm sure it's just MORE..
I think the article did claim this, but there were a few other technical errors in the article(s), so I was never sure if that was accurate. They did mention spinning past 7000rpm though, so maybe the neon blue car did have solids.


Has anyone profiled the AMG E/SL 60 cams or do I need to dig em out and get them run...??
The numbers you provided to me were 10.15mm intake lift, 9.40mm exhaust lift. No profile data. I'm not sure what year/engine those cams were from.


Christian brings up a good point, how about type of steel & longevity in aluminum heads, vs cost? For $4k/set they better set the world on fire!!

:D :D
 
Discussions will be had with said cam manufactures...I'm quite certain given the plethora of options we can find one that will not only work, but work well and Last as we would expect them to!

...lord knows I don't feel like going back in to any of my engines any more then is Necessary, nor would I expect anyone to feel otherwise re: their 119;)

Jono

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Fireing Blanks? Hope not!

Good to see someone get his hands out his pockets, nice Christian, a lot of work and research. A lot of time and€ but there is another route to go, namely AMG E50
I did lift the timing cover off, and what I found out was, yes as has been said, lift intake 10.4 exh. 9.4, duration, not meassured yet.

Having driven my E50 a couple of times after the gearbox change, I must say I'm not diapointed and very eager to try the converted 119 980 to LH in a 036
(there are a few alteratives, the 500E, 400E and now a fellow 036er after trying out the E50 wants to have that E50 motor put in)

Pictures of the E50 cams
 

Attachments

  • amg cam4.jpg
    amg cam4.jpg
    648.8 KB · Views: 20
  • amg cam3.jpg
    amg cam3.jpg
    445.1 KB · Views: 20
  • amg cam 2.jpg
    amg cam 2.jpg
    462.9 KB · Views: 18
  • amg cam.jpg
    amg cam.jpg
    550.9 KB · Views: 18
  • amg cam5.jpg
    amg cam5.jpg
    613.6 KB · Views: 20
The numbers you provided to me [for AMG E60 cams] were 10.15mm intake lift, 9.40mm exhaust lift. No profile data. I'm not sure what year/engine those cams were from.
Update: The guy selling the .97x and .98x AMG E60 cams on BenzWorld a couple years ago measured them as:

.97x E60 = 10.2mm intake, 9.7mm exhaust (part numbers / codes 18,19,20,21)
.98x E60 = 10.1mm intake, 9.6mm exhaust (part numbers / codes 26,27,30,31)

Photos are here: http://www.w124performance.com/images/M119/camshafts/

:v8:
 
Bernard had 6L AMG cams in his shop on the meet this year. They have 10.4mm intake and 10.2mm exhaust lift. 100% sure.
Pictures of his 6L LH cams:
What we don't know is which cams those are. AMG had at least 3 different versions of the M119 6L cams, and possibly even more than 3.

Bummer that one cam lobe was damaged in the photos!!

:(
 
Hallo My Name is Markus and i came from Germany Hometown Magdeburg. I have an 500e from 92 and w210 e50amg .Lancia Thema 8.32. i love all of the cars but the 500 is the best:nobmw:.
Sorry my english is not very good. Now i reed some times hereand found some intressting information about cams.
Now i have some Questions.1. I have a origninal brand new Set self buyed by local MB-Dealer here in Magdeburg for a 6,0l M119 all of the "Nockenwellen Kennzahl"ID-NUMBER have number 19 left Head inlent Outlet AMG 19 right Head Inlet Outlet AMG 19. For about maybe 2/3 Years i bought some Heads from a BRABUS w210 e60. And wonder wonder all of the cams has AMG 19 Cams Inside .I haved an Brief / Titel with 440ps but iam lost :-(((((.Also i have a set of regrind 420 cams but not sure from Hagmann or Dbialas.
I heard some Different Information Erliey cams 18,19,20,21 and later cams 26,27,30,31 now im little confusioned.
In my e50 i can look in 3 weeks with the cams ,then i must change the Timingchain .This Engine has aprox 200,000 on the clock .He is some leacking oil in the Front cover.

Regrads Markus
 
Markus,

Glad to have you on the list!! There are few owners of 6.0 here, so you are welcome.

"I haved an Brief / Titel with 440ps but iam lost ((((.Also i have a set of regrind 420 cams but not sure from Hagmann or Dbialas"

Would be very interested in what "420 cams" you have. Are these for the LH injected 119.970? or for the later W210 w 119.980?


Michael
 
Dbilas made M119 AMG cams in the early 1990s.. Dbilas was showing me the invoices as i was in their shop.
Really? Wow! I thought Dbilas only did regrinds. Were they making AMG cams from fresh blanks, or regrinding...?

:blink:
 
Really? Wow! I thought Dbilas only did regrinds. Were they making AMG cams from fresh blanks, or regrinding...?

:blink:
Fresh chilled cast iron blanks of course, like available through Mahle during the production time and some years later after the M119s time. The blanks getting grind too, the only difference is that you can keep the stock base circle.
Our stock M119 cams are also made from the very same chilled cast iron blanks as the tuners cams, just with another profile. I wonder if Mahle also did the grind on the Stock cams for Mercedes and delivered the finished cams for assembly on the motor line?

Dbilas is a "specialist" for camshaft grinds and head rework. I was visiting their shop and their manufacturer/machining area, as i was really hard to him with questioning. At the beginning he was so annoyed with my doubts that regrinds with around -1mm base circle will work in M119s, because Bernard said they will not and Bernard heard of nobody in the world in his last 10+ years that had regrind M119 cams, that Dbilas wanted to throw me out of the shop hahahaha. Yes i went to far this time with doubting and critical questions, reciting some negative comments about Dbilas regrinds from the M102 and M103 engines that i heard through forums and from one guy that workd for Vaeth, which i met this year as i met Gerry in Aschaffenburg. Anyway, i cooled Dbilas down and apologized so he threw all kinds of invoices at me, showing me the AMG ones any many others of famous car and Motorcylce manufacturers. Many many tuners of all brands getting their cams ground at Dbilas. Even Schrick sends their cam blanks for the Volkswagen camshafts to Dbilas for grinding - i saw this on the invoices myself after i heard that rumor in an VW forum.

Like stated earlier, they can also made M119 cams from steel, but it makes no sense as billet steel cams are approx 30% heavier, no matter what appropirate for camshafts steel is used. Nobody wants to have a heavier valve-train lol! You could counter that by making the center oil bore veeery large, but this will kill all the engine pressures, as pressure comes from resistance. Bernard said to me, like stated before, its a reason none of the M119 tuners ever produced Steel cams for the M119s. Yes and you also would have to take care about the camshaft journals/bearings. Mentioned before Coating is not a simple process which can be done with assembled heads, ohh and who does calculate for the different heat expansion coefficient over different head oil-temperatures? Who tries that over 100.000miles and checks for wear and stuff?
So sorry but its no plug-and-play for steel cams at all.
Anyway Dbilas makes maaaaany Steel cams for engines where no original material blanks are available. Especially classic cars, motorcycles and so forth. As i was there, they had like 500+ cams sitting in the shop in the CNC Mill area. All current customer projects, no in-stock cams. I was positively surprised and i wonder if he would have showed me the heart of their machining area when i wouldn't have asked those critical questions and getting on his nerves lol.
 

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 2) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 2) View details

Back
Top