Thanks Gerry,
I've looked at the ones in the video already, but I'm still having a hard time deciding if I want to go catless.
We no longer have air/emissions inspections over here, but I'm mostly concerned about the volume.
I would love for a raw V8 sounding exhaust, but it would be bad if it is excessively loud.
Can anyone explain to a newbie like me, whether I should go catless or go with cats?
Hello,
I don't want to steer this thread away from it's main purpose, or contradict anyone's ideals or expectations, but there are some proofs to consider before you pay your way to a little-bit-of rumble....
1 I would advise you to go with the cat-less option. It will enhance your potential to make HP, especially in the lower to mid RPM ranges. You've eliminated some ( maybe even 1/2 of your ) back-pressure.
2 All V-8's require a full-length twin system, as the volume of the exhaust system can hold more spent gas, & rid it sooner, before back-pressure costs you pumping losses at your piston crown, since your piston & crank start pushing the exhaust waste out, instead of turning your wheels...
3 These engines are too precise in refinement due to electronic intervention to extract any more HP from exhaust modifications, though bottom-end to mid-range potential will be enhanced. This means no peak-power increase is possible / negligible. These babies are pre-set & can't be altered, unless you take the friction modifying route...( But that's for elsewhere ).
4 I would recommend a full maximum diameter twin system running the full length of the vehicle, & into a twin pipe inlet / outlet rear muffler. Ensure that the muffler inlet & outlet pipes are the same diameter.
5 Think of this, a V-8 purging all its exhaust into a single pipe gives us around 8,000 slugs of exhaust pulses to deal with at 2,000 RPM. 16,000 slugs at 4,000 RPM. And 24,000 slugs at 6,000 RPM, all fighting their way out to the atmosphere. At WOT, these slugs are huge & long blasts, that interfere with each other & cause HUGE increases in back-pressure, & loss of potential power at WOT.
With a full length twin system, your interference of pulses & thus back pressure is halved, ( or at least significantly reduced ) & thus, potential to gain extra power is potentially doubled. It's pretty obvious I think yes ?....
6 This excess back-pressure has the potential to even hold exhaust valves off their seats, especially if valve springs are worn & don't hold their seating pressure, though very unlikely. ( eg 5.0 bar back pressure = approx. 75 psi. Some valve springs have a seat pressure of 90 psi depending on manufacturers etc ).
Once again, these are my personal thoughts, explained very simply with simple maths as proofs / real-possibility, & I do not wish to sway anyone in their considerations. But when the price that's paid for some stuff, is equal to or greater than what a custom set of twin big-pipes, (even into a genuine MB twin-rear-muffler ) into a twin-rear-muffler is concerned, you need options to think about. And you need to recognize that the only power-gains that will be made due to computer design criteria will be in the lower to mid RPM ranges, with this engine.
Seriously folks, IMHO, it's got to be a full-length twin system, or your only going to be chasing a different exhaust note !
Kind regards, & no disrespect,
Sellc
Last edited:











